Abstract
- Capossela, T-L. (1996). What is critical writing? In T-L. Capossela (Ed.), The critical writing workshop: Designing writing assignments to foster critical thinking (pp. 1–16). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook.
- Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
- Dixon, F. A. (1996). The use of the Hegelian Dialectic as a heuristic in literature classes to improve critical thinking skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
- Dlugos, P. (2003). Using critical thinking to assess the ineffable. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 613–629.
- Dybdahl, C. S., Shaw, D. G., & Blahous, E. (1997). The impact of computer on writing: No simple answers. Computers in the Schools, 13(3/4), 41–53.
- Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.
- Halpern, D. (1984). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
- Hartley, J. (1993). Writing, thinking, and computers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 22–31.
- Kerr, B. A., & Cohn, S. J. (2001). Smart boys: Talent, manhood, and the search for meaning. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
- Kurfiss, J. G. (1997). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2) Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
- Li, K. F., & Adamson, G. (1995). Motivational patterns related to gifted students’ learning of mathematics, science, and English: An examination of gender differences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 284–297.
- MacArthur, C. A. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344–354.
- McKeachie, W. J., Chism, N., Menges, R., Svinicki, M., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.
- Nichols, L. M. (1996). Pencil and paper versus word processing: A comparative study of creative writing in the elementary school. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 159–166.
- Owston, R. D., Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students’ writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the teaching of English, 26, 249–276.
- Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (1997). Word processors and children’s writing in a high-computer-access setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 202–220.
- Paul, R. (1996). Critical thinking workshop handbook. Sonoma, CA: The Center for Critical Thinking.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2001). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Peterson, S. E. (1993). A comparison of student revisions when composing with pen and paper versus word-processing. Computers in the Schools, 9, 55–69.
- Reed, W. M. (1996). Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in writing instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 418–437.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Watson, G., & Glaser, G. M. (1980). The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Cleveland, OH: Psychology Corporation.
- Yanchar, S. C., & Slife, B. D. (2003, August). The contribution of theoretical psychology to critical thinking. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
- Volume 16
- Issue 4
- Publication Date: Summer 2005
Effects of Technology on Critical Thinking and Essay Writing Among the Gifted Adolescents
Felicia Dixon, Jerrell Cassady, Tracy Cross, and David Williams
This article presents results of a study that compared critical thinking in two writing samples (essays) from gifted adolescents who attended a residential school. The essays were written at the beginning of the junior year (when students were admitted to the school) and at the beginning of the senior year. All students in the study composed their first essay in handwritten form. On the second essay, some students were randomly assigned to a computer condition and composed their essays on the computer. Results demonstrated a gender-specific effect of using computers to compose essays. Boys using the computers produced significantly more words, sentences, and paragraphs than boys who did not use the computer to write and received higher ratings on a structured rubric. Girls scored the same in both conditions and performed consistently at a level on par with the boys using computers.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.