Abstract
- Barron, F., & Eisner, E. (1980). Creativity: The human resource. San Ramon, CA: Chevron.
- Baum, S., Cooper, C. R., & Neu, T. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477–490.
- Baum, S., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD, and more. Exceptionality 10(2), 77–92.
- Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
- Brandwein, P. F. (1995). Science talent in the young expressed within ecologies of achievement. (RBDM 9510). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
- Cooper, C. R., Baum, S. M., & Neu, T. W. (2004). Developing scientific talent in students with special needs: An alternative model for identification, curriculum, and assessment. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 162–169.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. A. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
- Freeman, J., Span, P., & Wagner, H. (1995). Actualizing talent: A lifelong challenge. London: Cassell.
- Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: BasicBooks.
- Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Littky, D., with Grabelle, S. (2004). The big picture: Education is everyone’s business. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Nielsen, E. M. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality 10(2), 93–112.
- Neu, T. W. (2003). When the gifts are camouflaged by disability: Identifying and developing the talent in gifted students with disabilities. In A. J. Castellano (Ed.), Who are the underrepresented in gifted education? Working with diverse gifted learners. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. (1999). Talent in two places: Case studies of high-ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 463–479.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
- Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2003). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world student-driven learning. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
- Robinson, G. (2004). Replicating a successful authentic science research program: An interview with Dr. Robert Pavlica. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 148–154.
- Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligences determine success in life. New York: Penguin Group.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Volume 16
- Issue 1
- Publication Date: Fall 2004
Talent Development in Science: A Unique Tale of One Student’s Journey
Terry W. Neu, Susan M. Baum, and Carolyn R. Cooper
This narrative presents the educational route followed by an Intel Science and Engineering Fair (Intel ISEF) winner who was not always recognized for his scientific abilities. Factors contributing to the success of this gifted student are presented, as well as his creative insights for solving the problem that gave rise to the winning project. Further, the major issues that emerged from this student’s story can inform both professional development and instructional practice. These issues include: the need to recognize science talent or creative productive behaviors in students with special needs; students’ need for an experiential science curriculum that incorporates multidisciplinary perspectives from which to study and apply the discipline of science, not merely the subject matter; the power of collaboration between students with similar interests; and the value of developing instructional strategies that accommodate a variety of learning difficulties and learning styles.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.