Abstract
- Adams, J., Priest, R. F., & Prince, H. T. (1985). Achievement motive: Analyzing the validity of the WOFO. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 357–370.
- Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
- Berk, L. E. (2000). Child development (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Brooks, L., Holahan, W., & Galligan, M. (1985). The effects of a nontraditional role-modeling intervention on sex typing of occupational preferences and career salience in adolescent females. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 264–276.
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
- Dunnell, P. A., & Backen, L. (1991). Gifted high school students’ attitudes toward careers and sex roles. Roeper Review, 13, 198–202.
- Fleming, E. S., & Hollinger, C. L. (1979). Project choice: Creating her options in career exploration. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
- Galambos, N. L., Almeida, D. M., & Petersen, A. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61, 1905–1914.
- Galambos, N. L., Petersen, A. C., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–357.
- Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.
- Hall, J. A. & Halberstadt, A. G. (1980). Masculinity and femininity in children: Development of the Children’s Personality Attributes Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 16, 270–280.
- Kerr, B. A. (1995). Smart girls two. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
- Kerr, B. A., & Colangelo, N. (1988). The college plans of academically talented students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 42–49.
- Leung, S. A., Conoley, C. W., & Scheel, M. J. (1994). The career and educational aspirations of gifted high school students: A retrospective study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 298–303.
- Massad, C. M. (1981). Sex role identity and adjustment during adolescence. Child Development, 52, 1290–1298.
- Pollack, W. S. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.
- Raffaele Mendez, L. M. (2000). Gender roles and achievement-related choices: A comparison of early adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 24, 149–169.
- Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83–89.
- Reis, S. M., Callahan, C. M., & Goldsmith, D. (1996). Attitudes of adolescent gifted girls and boys toward education, achievement, and the future. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on females talent development (pp. 209–224). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38, 243–248.
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Stevens, G., & Featherman, D. L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10, 364–395.
- Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted child grows up: Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 4). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical abstract of the U.S.: 1992 (112th ed.). Washington, D.C.
- U.S. Department of Commerce. (1980). Detailed occupation and years of school completed by age, for the civilian labor force, by sex, race, and Spanish origin: 1980 (PC 80–51–8, Supplemental Report). Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Trends in educational equity of girls and women (NCES Publication No. 2000–030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
- U.S. Department of Labor. (1998). Employment and earnings. Washington, DC: Bureau of Statistics.
- Volume 13
- Issue 3
- Publication Date: Spring 2002
Gender-Role Stereotyping and Career Aspirations: A Comparison of Gifted Early Adolescent Boys and Girls
Linda M. Raffaele Mendez and Kelly M. Crawford
This study examined the career aspirations of gifted early adolescent boys and girls utilizing a career aspirations measure that differentiated between the careers that were still being considered by each student versus those that had been ruled out. Careers were classified by sex type (male dominated, female dominated, or balanced), education required (high school degree, college degree, graduate degree), and prestige associated with the career. Assessments of gender-related personality attributes, achievement motivation, and attitudes toward the rights and roles of women also were administered to provide information on the correlates of career aspirations among gifted early adolescent students (examined separately by gender). Results showed that girls were interested in a significantly greater number of careers (i.e., had ruled out fewer occupations than boys). Girls also showed greater gender-role flexibility in their career aspirations than their male counterparts. Boys aspired to careers that were significantly higher in education required and prestige level than girls. The strength and direction of the relationships between career aspirations and gender-related personality attributes and achievement motivation varied by gender. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the differing career development needs of gifted early adolescent boys and girls.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.