Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Barrell, J. (1991). Creating our own pathways: Teaching students to become self-directed. In N. Colangelo and G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 256–270). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
  • Borland, J. (2000, April 27). Discussant statements made at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
  • Dewey, J. (1932). How we think. Boston: Heath.
  • Dickens, C. (1861). Great expectations. London: Penguin Books.
  • Dixon, F. A. (1993). Literature seminars for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 16(4), 15–19.
  • Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.
  • Gallagher, J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 5–12.
  • Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93–104.
  • Halpern, D. (1984). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kolloff, P. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). Seminar: Instructional approach for gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 9(5), 2–7.
  • Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. (ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 2). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
  • Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38–43.
  • Paul, R. (1996). Critical thinking workshop handbook. Sonoma, CA: The Center for Critical Thinking.
  • Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
  • Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Van Tassel-Baska, J., Feldhusen, J. F., Seeley, K., Wheatley, G., Silverman, L., & Foster, W. (1988). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Van Tassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Boyce, L. (1996). Developing verbal talent. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 13
  •  Issue 2
  • Publication Date: Winter 2002



The Memorable Link: Designing Critical Thinking Activities That Stimulate Synthesis and Evaluation Among Verbally Gifted Adolescents

Felicia A. Dixon

There is a need for activities that foster critical thinking on a regular basis within secondary literature-based courses. The rationale for teaching thinking skills is presented, and activities that focus on synthesis and evaluation are presented and discussed. The call for curricula that both model and encourage the thinking skills that students possess is a challenge for all educators who teach verbally gifted students. The call to action is for teachers to become critical thinkers in their determination of content, process, and product choices for high-ability verbal students.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.