Abstract
Reference
X
- Ambrose, D. (1998). A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 77–86.
- Borland, J. H. (1990). Postpositivist inquiry: Implications of the “new philosophy of science” for the field of the education of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 161–167.
- Coleman, L. J., Sanders, M. D., & Cross, T. L. (1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 105–111.
- Roeper, A. (1995). Annemarie Roeper: Selected writings and speeches. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
- Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
Email To A Friend
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
Bookmark
- Volume 12
- Issue 3
- Publication Date: Spring 2001
Negotiating the Sands of Time: The First Hundredth XX
Robert A. Schultz
In the first decade of the millennium, gifted child education can profit by looking back as a field and documenting where we have been. Dialogically, we also need to set a course for the future with clearly defined statements of intention grounded in the best practice of the present. In this opinion piece, I convey and discuss three foci—teacher education, research approaches, evaluation and accountability—each ripe for exploration and exploitation as scholars and practitioners of gifted child education pursue a broader sphere of influence in public education.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.