Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Albertson, L. R. (1998). A cognitive-behavioral intervention study: Assessing the effects of strategy instruction on story writing. [On-line]. ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT 9826325.
  • Albertson L. R., & Billingsley, F. F. (1998). Improving children’s story writing: A direct instruction approach. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 15(2), 13–27.
  • Albrecht, P. (1981). Using precision teaching techniques to encourage creative writing. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 2, 18–21.
  • Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (1986). The writing report card: Writing achievement in American schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
  • Brewster, M. (1989). Creative writing and the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 12(6), 24–25.
  • Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D., & Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review 8, 239–298.
  • Calkin, A. B. (1996). Measuring creative writing. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14(1), 89–90.
  • Campbell, J. R., Voelkl, K. E., & Donahue, P. L. (1998). NAEP 1996 trends in academic progress. Addendum. Achievement of U.S. students in science, 1969–1996; mathematics, 1973–1996; writing, 1984 to 1996. Revised. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Collins, N. D., & Cross, T. L. (1993). Teaching the writing process to gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 16(3), 22–23.
  • Collins, N. D., & Parkhurst, L. (1996). Teaching strategies for gifted children in the regular classroom. Roeper Review, 18, 277–279.
  • Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481–506.
  • Fitzgerald, J., & Markham, L. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction, 4(1), 3–24.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.
  • Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16–55.
  • Ganopole, S. J. (1988). Reading and writing for the gifted: A whole language perspective. Roeper Review, 11, 88–91.
  • Ganschow, L. (1985). Diagnosing and remediating writing problems of gifted students with language learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9, 25–43.
  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20–41). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
  • Jampole, E. S., Konopak, B. C., Readence, J. E., & Moser, B. E. (1991). Using mental imagery to enhance gifted elementary students’ creative writing. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 12, 183–197.
  • Jampole, E. S., Mathews, F. N., & Konopak, B. C. (1994). Academically gifted students’ use of imagery for creative writing. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 28, 1–15.
  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lindsley, O. R. (1995). Ten products of fluency. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 13(1), 2–11.
  • Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15–21.
  • MacArthur, C. A., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Helping students with learning disabilities plan compositions: Instruction in cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In J. S. Carlson (Series Ed.) & E. C. Butterfield (Vol. Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 2. Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 273–199). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Manning, B. H., Glasner, S. E., & Smith, E. R. (1996). The self-regulated learning aspect of metacognition: A component of gifted education. Roeper Review, 18, 217–223.
  • Martella, R. C., Nelson, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). Research methods: Learning to become a critical research consumer. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 98–101.
  • Roush, N. M. (1992). The collaborative approach to writing. Gifted Child Today, 15(5), 29–31.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written composition. In C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 142–175). New York: Cambridge.
  • Schunk, D., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15, 225–230.
  • Spaulding, J., Haertel, M. W., Seevers, R. L., & Cooper, J. O. (1995). Visual imagery and structure words: Accelerating number of words and number of descriptive words written during free writing. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 13(1), 13–24.
  • Trollope, A. (1946). An autobiography. London: Williams & Norgate.
  • Wallace, I., & Pear, J. J. (1977). Self-control techniques of famous novelists. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 515–525.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 12
  •  Issue 2
  • Publication Date: Winter 2001



Using Strategy Instruction and Self-Regulation to Improve Gifted Students’ Creative Writing

Luann R. Albertson and Felix F. Billingsley

In an extension of a previous investigation, we examined the effects of an instructional package consisting of strategy instruction and self-regulation techniques on the story writing of two gifted, middle school students. Specifically, we used a multiple-baseline, time-series design across the two students to determine whether strategy instruction and self-regulation techniques would affect planning, text production, rates of writing (i.e., fluency), reviewing, and writing quality. Strategies for planning and reviewing involved the use of printed prompts that could be used by the participants. Self-regulation components included goal setting, charting, and monitoring the amount of time spent planning, number of words written, rate of words written per minute, and number of story elements. The findings indicated that, following application of the instructional package, both participants wrote longer stories, increased their writing fluency, and included more story elements. Conversely, we noted that the participants spent less time planning and reviewing and less time writing as the study progressed. Finally, independent raters judged stories the students wrote following intervention to be of higher overall quality than ones they had written earlier. We discuss limitations of the study and implications of the findings for practice and future research.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.