Abstract
- Assouline, S., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2005). Developing math talent: A guide for educating gifted and advanced learners in math. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Cogan, L., Schmidt, H., & Wiley, D. (2001). Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMSS to characterize U.S. students’ eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 323–341.
- Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 1). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
- Gabelko, N., & Sosniak, L. (2002). “Someone just like me”: When academic engagement trumps race, class, and gender. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 400–408.
- Gallagher, J. J. (2004). Public policy in gifted education. In S. Reis (Series Ed.), Essential readings in gifted education, vol. 12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Gamoran, A., & Hannigan, E. C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students of diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 241–254.
- Greene, B., Herman, M., & Haury D. (2000). TIMSS: What have we learned about math and science teaching? Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED463948).
- Hallinan, M. (2000, August). Ability group effects on high school learning outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
- Ma, X. (2000, September/October). A longitudinal assessment of antecedent course work in mathematics and subsequent mathematical attainment. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 16–29.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Effective schools in mathematics (NCES No. 065–000-0076-1). Washington, DC: Author.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Third International Mathematics and Science Study (NCES No. 2001-027). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). NAEP 2000 mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Schiller, K. S., & Muller, C. (2003). Raising the bar and equity? Effects of state high school graduation requirements and accountability policies on students’ mathematics course taking. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 299–315.
- Schmidt, W. (2003) Too little, too late: American high schools in an international context. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 253–278). Baltimore: Brookings Institute Press.
- Smith, J. (1996). Does an extra year make any difference? The impact of early access to algebra on long-term gains in mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 141–153.
- Spade, J., Columba, L., & Vanfossen, B. (1997, April). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70, 108–127.
- Spielhagen, F. (2006). Closing the achievement gap in math: Considering eighth-grade algebra for all students. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 29–42.
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (2000) Curriculum policy development for secondary gifted programs: A prescription for reform coherence. NASSP Bulletin, 84(615), 14–29.
- Volume 18
- Issue 1
- Publication Date: Fall 2006
Closing the Achievement Gap in Math: The Long-Term Effects of Eighth-Grade Algebra
Frances R. Spielhagen
Recent changes in national and state mathematics standards have increased the level of algebraic thinking taught in younger grades. These changes have prompted more inclusive curriculum designs that open the opportunity to enroll in advanced mathematics courses at younger ages. Of particular interest to this study is the access to eighth-grade algebra, once traditionally reserved for select populations. This study examined long-term academic outcomes for students who did or did not enroll in eighth-grade algebra in one district that implemented an initiative to increase access. The outcomes of students with similar ability, as measured by preassessment in seventh grade, were compared. The groups performed similarly on end-of-course exams in high school math and the mathematics section of the SAT I. However, students who completed algebra in the eighth grade stayed in the mathematics pipeline longer and attended college at greater rates than those who did not. Because of the sequential nature of mathematics course work, students taking algebra at an earlier age have the opportunity to enroll in more advanced courses in the future. Results suggest the need for further exploration of how to provide access and promote enrollment in eighth-grade algebra for students who demonstrate readiness.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.