User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 32 |  Issue 1 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students’ perspectives of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 7–20.
  • Akintunde, O. (2004). A letter to Matthew. Multicultural Perspectives, 6, 49–52.
  • Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2001). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. (2004). In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Cabell, D. W. E., & English, D. L. (2006a). Cabell’s directory of publishing opportunities in educational curriculum and methods, Volume I (7th ed.). Beaumont, TX: Cabell Publishing.
  • Cabell, D. W. E., & English, D. L. (2006b). Cabell’s directory of publishing opportunities in educational curriculum and methods, Volume II (7th ed.). Beaumont, TX: Cabell Publishing.
  • Cabell, D. W. E., & English, D. L. (2006c). Cabell’s directory of publishing in educational psychology and administration, Volume II (7th ed.). Beaumont, TX: Cabell Publishing.
  • Chamberlin, S. A., & Moore, A. (2006). Cognizance of gifted education among elementary education professors in MCREL member states. Roeper Review, 29, 49–54.
  • Clark, C., & Gorski, P. (2002). Multicultural education and the digital divide: Focus on gender. Multicultural Perspectives, 4, 30–40.
  • Cramond, B. (2004). Can we, should we, need we agree on a definition of giftedness? Roeper Review, 27, 15–16.
  • Davis, J. E. (2003). Early schooling and academic achievement of African-American males. Urban Education, 38, 515–537.
  • DISCOVER III. (1997, August). A symposium on culture-fair, intelligence-fair alternative assessment for identification of gifted individuals. Presented at the 12th World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Seattle, WA.
  • Fashola, O. S. (2003). Developing the talents of African-American male students during the non-school hours. Urban Education, 38, 398–430.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (2003). Beyond general giftedness: New ways to identify and educate gifted, talented, and precocious youth. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 34–45). New York: College Teachers Press.
  • Ferguson, R. E. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38, 460–507.
  • Ford, D. Y., Baytops, J. L., & Harmon, D. A. (1997). Helping gifted minority students reach their potential: Recommendations for change. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 201–216.
  • Ford, D., & Grantham, T. (1996). Multicultural gifted education: A wakeup call to the profession. Roeper Review, 19, 72–78.
  • Ford, D., & Harris, J. J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking. Roeper Review, 24, 52–58.
  • Gorski, P. (2000). Multicultural education for equity in schools: A working definition. Retrieved on February 2, 2005, from http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/initial.html.
  • Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179–183.
  • Grantham, T. (2004). Rocky Jones: Case study of a high-achieving Black male’s motivation to participate in gifted classes. Roeper Review, 26, 208–215.
  • Hartnett, D. N., Nelson, J. M., & Rinn, A. N. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The possibility of misdiagnosis. Roeper Review, 26, 73–76.
  • Holmes, S. N. (2003). To be young, gifted, and Black: An exploratory study of a special population of African-American female adolescent students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(8-B), 3895. (UMI No. 3062469).
  • Karnes, F. A., & Nugent, S. A. (2002). Publishing in gifted education: Information for writers. Roeper Review, 25, 32–36.
  • Mayer, J. D. (2001). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 131–137.
  • McCarthy, L. (2003). What about the “T”? Is multicultural education ready to address transgender issues? Multicultural Perspectives, 5, 46–48.
  • Möonks, F. J., Heller, K. A., & Passow, A. H. (2000). Reflections on where we are and where we are going. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Möonks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 839–863). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Montecinos, C., & Nielsen, L. E. (2004). Male elementary preservice teachers gendering of teaching. Multicultural Perspectives, 6, 3–9.
  • Moon, S. M., & Cleveland, E. (2001, November). Minority initiative for gifted students: Model I. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Moore, S. E., & Moore, C. A. (2003). As you look into the eyes of the people. Multicultural Perspectives, 5, 41–42.
  • National Association for Multicultural Education. (2003). What is the purpose of NAME? Retrieved on February 4, 2005, from http://www.nameorg.org/resources/FAQs.htm#WHAT_IS_NAME.
  • Newman, J. L. (2005). Talents and type IIIs: The effects of the talents unlimited model on creative productivity in gifted youngsters. Roeper Review, 27, 84–90.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. Y., Ngoi, M., & Ngoi, D. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 127–158.
  • Reay, D. (2004). Exclusivity, exclusion, and social class in urban education markets in the United Kingdom. Urban Education, 39, 537–560.
  • Rueda, R., Monzó, L. D., & Higareda, I. (2004). Appropriating the sociocultural resources of Latino paraeducators for effective instruction with Latino students: Promise and problems. Urban Education, 39, 52–90.
  • Taylor, G., & Nikolova, O. (2004). Influence of gender and academic ability in a computer-based Spanish reading task. Roeper Review, 27, 42–51.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Williams, D. (2004). Improving race relations in higher education: The jigsaw classroom as a missing piece to the puzzle. Urban Education, 39, 316–344.
  • Worrell, F. C., & Schaefer, B. A. (2004). Reliability and validity of Learning Behaviors Scale (LBS) scores with academically talented students: A comparative perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 287–308.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 32
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Fall 2008
  • Page Number(s): 86-99
  • DOI: 10.4219/jeg-2008-820



An Examination of Articles in Gifted Education and Multicultural Education Journals

Scott A. Chamberlin

An analysis of gifted education and multicultural education journals was performed to identify the number of multicultural education articles in gifted education journals and the number of gifted education articles in multicultural education journals. Journals reviewed were Multicultural Education, Multicultural Perspectives, Urban Education, Gifted Child Quarterly, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, and Roeper Review (1995 to 2004). Issues related to multicultural education are discussed in gifted education journals, but issues related to gifted education are largely neglected in multicultural education journals. Implications are that policy makers in the two fields need to discuss ways to infuse issues related to gifted education into the discourse on multicultural education.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
You have 6 item(s) in your cart.
Last item you added is
Notes From the Editor’s Desk.

View Cart