User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 31 |  Issue 1 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Baldwin, A., & Valle, W. (1999). The many faces of giftedness: Lifting the mask. Ontario, Canada: Wadsworth.
  • Baum, S., & Olenchak, F. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD and more. Exceptionality, 10(2), 77–91.
  • Baum, S., & Owen, S. (2003). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strategies for helping bright students with LD, ADHD, and more. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Beckley, D. (1998). Gifted and learning disabled: Twice exceptional students. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • Bireley, M. (1991). The paradoxical needs of the disabled gifted. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues (pp.163–175). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282–296.
  • Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (2004). Linking assessment and diagnosis to intervention for gifted students with learning disabilities. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities: Identification, assessment, and outcomes (pp. 73–94). New York: Kluwer Academic.
  • Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Cline, S., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Diverse populations of gifted children: Meeting their needs in the regular classroom and beyond. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Coleman, M. R. (2003). The identification of students who are gifted. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Service Reproduction No. ED480431).
  • Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268–275.
  • Coleman, M. R., Gallagher, J. J., & Foster, A. (1994). Updated report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Dix, J., & Schafer, S. (1996). From paradox to performance: Practical strategies for identifying and teaching GT/LD students. Gifted child today, 19(1), 22–25, 28–31.
  • Fetzer, E. (2000). The gifted/learning disabled child: A guide for teachers and parents. Gifted Child Today, 23(4), 44–50.
  • Grimm, J. (1998). The participation of gifted students with disabilities. Roeper Review, 20, 285–287.
  • Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (2005). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C.1400 et seq. (2004).
  • Johnson, L. J., Karnes, M. B., & Carr, V. W. (1997). Providing services to children with gifts and disabilities: A critical need. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 516–527). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Karnes, F. A. (2003). State of the states gifted and talented education report 2001–2002: Council of state directors of programs for the gifted. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
  • Karnes, F. A. (2004). Appropriate practices for screening, identifying and instructing gifted/disabled youth. Hattiesburg, MS: University of Southern Mississippi.
  • Kaufman, F., Kalbfleisch, M. L., & Castellanos, F. X. (2000). Attention deficit disorders and gifted students: What do we really know (RBDM0105). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • Kokot, S. J. (2003). Diagnosing and treating learning disabilities in gifted children: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Gifted Education international, 17, 42–54.
  • Landrum, M. S. (2001). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 457–466.
  • Landrum, M. S. (2003). Consultation in gifted education: Teachers working together to serve students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegle, D. (2004). The identification of gifted students with learning disabilities: Challenges, controversies, and promising practices. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities: Identification, assessment, and outcomes (pp. 31–48). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Mills, C. J., & Brody, L. E. (1999). Overlooked and unchallenged: Gifted students with learning disabilities. Knowledge Quest, 27, 36–40.
  • Neihart, M. (2000). Gifted children with Asperger’s syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 222–230.
  • Neu, T. (2003). When gifts are camouflaged by disabilities: Identifying and developing talent in gifted students with disabilities. In J. Castellanos (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education: Working with diverse gifted learners (pp. 151–162). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 10, 93–112.
  • Reis, S. M., McGuire, J. M., & Neu, T. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted child Quarterly, 44, 123–144.
  • Silverman, L. K. (2000). The two-edged sword of compensation: How the gifted cope with learning disabilities. In K. Kay (Ed.), Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of the twice-exceptional student (pp. 153–159). Gilsum, NH: Avocus.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ward, S. B., Pelco, L. E., & Landrum, M. S. (1998). Getting noticed: An alternative, multi-component assessment model for identifying gifted preschool learners in at-risk populations. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 4, 38–44.
  • Webb, J. T., Amend, E. R., Webb, N. E., Goerrs, J., Beljan, P., & Olenchak, F. R. (2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnosis of gifted children and adults. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
  • Winner, E. (2000). Giftedness: Current theory and research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 153–156.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 31
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Fall 2007



Creating a Toolkit for Identifying Twice-Exceptional Students

William F. Morrison and Mary G. Rizza

Best practices in the identification of the twice-exceptional point to the use of multi-dimensional assessment that outlines specific areas of strength and concern. Students who are twice-exceptional remain a misunderstood population in schools, thus making identification that much more difficult. The purpose of this study was to review the extant literature in the field of twice-exceptional studies and to design a plan for identification to be used by school districts. This article reports on Project O2E, a state-funded collaboration program that resulted in a toolkit for identifying students who are twice-exceptional. Also included in this article is a discussion of issues raised during the implementation of the toolkit.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.