User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 30 |  Issue 3 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Athey, I. (1984). Contributions of play to development. In T. D. Yawkey & A. D. Pelligrini (Eds.), Child’s play: Developmental and applied (pp. 9–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bagnato, S. J., & Neisworth, J. T. (1991). Assessment for early intervention: Best practices for professionals. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Barber, C. (1996). The integration of a very able pupil with Asperger Syndrome into a mainstream school. British Journal of Special Education, 23, 19–24.
  • Barbour, N. B. (1992). Early childhood gifted education: A collaborative perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 145–162.
  • Barbour, N. E., & Shaklee, B. D. (1998). Gifted education meets Reggio Emilia: Visions for curriculum in gifted education for young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 228–237.
  • Baum, S. M., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD, and more. Exceptionality, 10, 77–91.
  • Bayley, N. (2005). Bayley Scales of Infant Development—III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corps.
  • Bernheimer, L. P., & Keogh, B. K. (1995). Weaving interventions into the fabric of everyday life: An approach to family assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 415–433.
  • Bricker, D., & Woods-Cripe, J. (1992). An activity-based approach to early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Buchanan, M. L., & Cooney, M. (2000). Play at home, play in the classroom: Family/professional partnerships in supporting child play. Young Exceptional Children, 3, 9–15.
  • Cash, A. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22, 22–27.
  • Chamberlin, S. A. (2005). Secondary mathematics for high-ability students. In F. Dixon & S. Moon (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 145–163). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Ciha, T. E., Harris, T. E., Hoffman, C., & Potter, M. W. (1974). Parents as identifiers of giftedness, ignored but accurate. Gifted Child Quarterly, 18, 191–195.
  • Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.
  • Dansky, J. L., & Silverman, I. W. (1973). Effects of play on associative fluency in pre-school age children. Developmental Psychology, 9, 38–43.
  • Davis, S. L. R. (2005). Predicting exceptionality, student achievement, and ISTEP scores using pre-school screening scores of Amish and English children. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65 (11-A), 4101 (AAI3152548). .
  • Feitelson, D., & Ross, G. S. (1973). The neglected factor-play. Human Development, 16, 202–223.
  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, M. B. (1979). Giftedness: A mixed blessing for the preschool child. In S. Long & B. Batchelor (Eds.), When there is crisis: Helping children cope with change (pp. 81–90). Terre Haute, IN: Indiana Association for the Education of Your Children.
  • Fewell, R. R. (1984). Play assessment scale (4th ed.). Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington at Seattle.
  • Gross, M. U. M. (1999). Small poppies: Highly gifted children in the early years. Roeper Review, 21, 207–214.
  • Guralnick, M. J., & Neville, B. (1997). Designing early intervention programs to promote children’s social competence. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention (pp. 579–610). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
  • Hanninen, G. (1979). Developing a preschool gifted/talented program. Gifted Child Today, 9, 18–19, 21.
  • Hartnett, D. N., Nelson, J. M., & Rinn, A. N. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The possibilities of misdiagnosis. Roeper Review, 26, 73.
  • Hertzog, N. B., Klein, M. M., & Katz, L. G. (1999). Hypothesizing and theorizing: Challenge in early childhood curriculum. Gifted and Talented International, 14, 38–49.
  • Hollingworth, L. (1923). Special talents and defects: Their significance for education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Hotulainen, R. H. E., & Schofield, N. J. (2003). Identified pre-school potential giftedness and its relation to academic achievement and self-concept at the end of Finnish comprehensive school. High Ability Studies, 14, 55–70.
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1401 et seq. (1990).
  • Karnes, F. A., Shaunessy, E., & Bisland, A. (2004). Gifted students with disabilities: Are we finding them? Gifted Child Today, 27, 16–21.
  • Karnes, M. B., & Taylor, A. R. (1978). Pre-school talent assessment guide. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Institute for Child Behavior and Development.
  • Karnes, M. B. (1983). Creativity and play. In M. B. Karnes (Ed.), The underserved: Our young gifted children (pp. 144–157). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Kay, K. (Ed.). (2000). Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of the twice exceptional student. Gilsum, NH: Avocus Publishing.
  • Kearney, K. (2000). Dysgraphia: Hiding in plain sight. In K. Kay (Ed.), Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of the twice exceptional student (pp. 37–55). Gilsum, NH: Avocus Publishing.
  • Kearney, K. (2001). Frequently asked questions about extreme intelligence in very young children Reno, NV: Davidson Institute for Talent Development.
  • Linder, T. (1993). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment: A functional approach to working with young children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Liu, Y. H., & Lien, J. (2005). Discovering gifted children in pediatric practice. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 366–369.
  • Lockert, J. (1997). Identifying gifted preschoolers: Appropriate practices. Agate, 11, 12–20.
  • Marguiles, A. S., & Floyd, R. G. (2004). Test review: Review of the gifted rating scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 175–180.
  • McCune-Nicholich, L. (1981). Toward symbolic functioning: Structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Development, 52, 785–797.
  • McLean, M. E., Wolery, M., & Bailey, D. B. (2004). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • McWilliam, R. A. (1992). Family-centered intervention planning: A routines-based approach Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
  • McWilliam, R. A. (2005). Assessing the resource needs of families in the context of early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), A developmental systems approach to early intervention: National and international perspectives (pp. 215–234) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Moon, S., & Dillon, D. R. (1995). Multiple exceptionalities: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 111–130.
  • Morelock, M. J., Brown, P., & Morrisey, A. M. (2003). Pretend play and maternal scaffolding: Comparisons of toddlers with advanced development, typical development, and hearing impairment. Roeper Review, 26, 41–51.
  • Morrison, W. F., & Omdal, S. N. (2000). The twice exceptional student. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 9, 103–106.
  • Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2006). NAGC standards. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/PDF/Standards_PDFs/k12 GT standards brochure.pdf.
  • Neihart, M. (2000). Gifted children with Asperger’s syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 222–230.
  • Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10, 93–111.
  • Newborg, J., Stock, J. R., Wnek, L., Guidubaldi, J., & Svinicki, J. (1988). Battelle Developmental Inventory. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Oakland, T., & Rossen, E. (2005). A 21st-century model for identifying students for gifted and talented programs in light of national conditions: An emphasis on race and ethnicity. Gifted Child Today, 28, 56–63.
  • Odom, S. L., McConnell, S. R., & Chandler, L. K. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of early education/specialized classroom settings and peer social interaction. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 316–330.
  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
  • Pletan, M. (1995). Parents observations about kindergartners who are advanced in mathematical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 30–44.
  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10, 113–125.
  • Roedell, W. C. (1989). Early development of gifted children. In J. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 13–28). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Roeper, A. (1977). The young gifted child. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 368–396 .
  • Roeper, A. (1997). Listen to the gifted child. Roeper Review, 19, 166–167.
  • Rogers, K. B. (1982). Cognitive characteristics of handicapped children’s play. In R. Plez (Ed.), Developmental and clinical aspects of young children’s play (Series Paper, No. 17). Monmouth, OR: Westar.
  • Rogers, M. T. (1986). A comparative study of developmental traits of gifted and average youngsters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
  • Rubin, K. H., Fein, G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality and social development (4th ed., pp. 693–774). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sandall, S., Hemmeter, M. L., Smith, B. J., & McLean, M. E. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
  • Serna, L., Nielsen, E., Mattern, N., & Forness, S. R. (2002). Use of different measures to identify preschoolers at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Impact on gender and ethnicity. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 415–437.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12, 37–42.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1996, October). Serving asynchronous children using the Columbus Group approach. Paper presented at Ohio Association for Gifted Children Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1997a). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 36–58.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1997b). Family counseling with the gifted. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 382–397). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Silverman, L. K. (2000). The two-edged sword of compensation: How the gifted cope with learning disabilities. In K. Kay (Ed.), Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of twice exceptional student (pp. 153–165). Gilsum, NH: Avocus Publishing.
  • Steinglass, P. (1984). Family systems theory and therapy: A clinical application of general systems theory. Psychiatric Annals, 14, 582–586.
  • Stile, S. W., Kitano, M., Kelley, P., & LeCrone, J. (1993). Early intervention with gifted children: A national survey. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 30–35.
  • Strop, J., & Goldman, D. (2002). The affective side: Emotional issues of twice exceptional students. Understanding Our Gifted, 14, 28–29.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1992). Early signs of giftedness: Research and commentary. In P. S. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), To be young and gifted (pp. 3–32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Thurman, S. K. (1997). Systems, ecologies, and the context of early intervention. In S. K. Thurman, J. R. Cornwell, & S. R. Gottwald (Eds.), Contexts of early intervention: Systems and settings (pp. 3–17). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). The role of play in development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (92–104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Westby, C. E. (1980). Assessment of cognitive and language abilities through play. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 154–168.
  • Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education for the gifted: The fifty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 41–63). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wright, L. (1993). Preschools for the gifted: What to look for. Understanding Our Gifted, 5, 10–13.
  • Wright, L., & Borland, J. H. (1993). Using early childhood developmental portfolios in the identification and education of young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 205–210.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 30
  •  Issue 3
  • Publication Date: Spring 2007



Serving Twice-Exceptional Preschoolers: Blending Gifted Education and Early Childhood Special Education Practices in Assessment and Program Planning

Scott A. Chamberlin, Michelle Buchanan, and Dana Vercimak

This article addresses considerations for assessment and intervention planning in serving twice-exceptional preschool children. The authors propose blending recommended assessment practices in early childhood gifted education and early childhood special education in a comprehensive assessment process. In doing so, unique needs of twice-exceptional preschool children may be better met. Interviewing family members and other caregivers to determine strengths and needs in daily routines and observing young children in play are two practices that provide critical information about the preschool child’s developmental status, family priorities, and daily life. The authors conclude that routines-based assessment (RBA) and play-based assessment (PBA) provide perspectives that standardized assessments alone cannot provide and that RBA and PBA may be especially effective in identifying and subsequently meeting the needs of twice-exceptional preschool children.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.