User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 30 |  Issue 1 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19, 229–236.
  • Bar-On, R., & Parker, J. D. A. (2000). BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (BarOn EQ-i: YV). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A response to Walker’s (1984) conclusion that there are none. Child Development, 57, 511–521.
  • Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (2003). Guide for DIT-2: A guide for using the Defining Issues Test, Version 2 (DIT-2) and the scoring service of the Center for the Study of Ethical Development. Minneapolis: Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota.
  • Breard, N. S. (1994). Exploring a different way to identify gifted African-American students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
  • Chan, D. W. (2003). Leadership skills training for Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: Does training make a difference? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 166–174.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development: Multilevelness and positive disintegration. Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Edmunds, A. L. (1998). Content, concurrent, and construct validity of the Leadership Skills Inventory. Roeper Review, 20, 281–284.
  • Ellis, J. L. (1990). Leadership Strengths Indicator: A self-report leadership analysis instrument for adolescents. Monroe, NY: Trillium.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112–127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Professional development module: TIDE-Talent identification and development in education (Field test edition). Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
  • Folsom, C. (1998). From a distance: Joining the mind and moral character. Roeper Review, 20, 265–270.
  • Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–80). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18, 103–111.
  • Gallagher, S. A. (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115–119.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Gonsalves, W. C., Grimm, J., & Welsh, J. M. (1981). Leadership training: A lesson in living. Roeper Review, 3(3), 16–19.
  • Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. New York: Routledge.
  • Hays, T. S. (1993). An historical content analysis of publications in gifted education journals. Roeper Review, 16, 41–43.
  • Howard-Hamilton, M. F. (1994). An assessment of moral development in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 17, 57–59.
  • Huckaby, W. O., & Sperling, H. B. (1981). Leadership giftedness: An idea whose time has not yet come. Roeper Review, 3(3), 19–22.
  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
  • Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspective (pp. 149–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1989). Leadership positions and sex role stereotyping among gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 76–78.
  • Karnes, F. A., & McGinnis, J. C. (1995). Looking for leadership: Students’ perceptions of leaders for the next millennium. Gifted Child Today, 18(1), 30–35.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In M. Hoffman & L. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (pp. 383–431). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, Volume I: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 77–113.
  • Mayer, J. D., Perkins, D. M., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2001). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 131–137.
  • Miller, N. B., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 20–38.
  • Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22, 10–17.
  • Oakland, T., Falkenberg, B. A., & Oakland, C. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth, and adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 138–146.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25–55). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80–88.
  • Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York: Merrill Macmillan.
  • Plowman, P. D. (1981). Training extraordinary leaders. Roeper Review, 3(3), 13–16.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT-2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 644–659.
  • Riley, T. L., & Karnes, F. A. (1994). Intellectually gifted elementary students’ perceptions of leadership. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 47–50.
  • Roets, L. F. (1997). Leadership: Skills training programs for ages 8–18 (8th ed.). Des Moines, IA: Leadership.
  • Ross, J. A., & Smyth, E. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: A case for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63–82.
  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.
  • Salovey, P., & Pizarro, D. A. (2003). The value of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 263–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Schiever, S. W. (1985). Creative personality characteristics and dimensions of mental functioning in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 7, 223–226.
  • Silverman, L. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17, 110–116.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Genius and giftedness: Parallels and discrepancies. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 39–82). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Sisk, D. A. (1993). Leadership education for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 491–505). New York: Pergamon.
  • Smith, D. L., Smith, L., & Barnette, J. (1991). Exploring the development of leadership giftedness. Roeper Review, 14, 7–12.
  • Smith, J. M. (1966). Setting conditions for creative teaching in the elementary school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Smyth, E., & Ross, J. A. (1999). Developing leadership skills of pre-adolescent gifted learners in small group settings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 204–211.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Wisdom as a form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 252–260.
  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tan-Willman, C., & Gutteridge, D. (1981). Creative thinking and moral reasoning of academically gifted secondary school adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 149–154.
  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Thorndike, R. (1940). Performance of gifted children on tests of developmental age. Journal of Psychology, 9, 337–343.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1981). Non-test ways of identifying the creatively gifted. In J. C. Gowan, J. Khatena, & E. P. Torrance (Eds.), Creativity: Its educational implications (2nd ed., pp. 165–170). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Treffinger, D. J., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181–193.
  • Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 677–691.
  • Walker, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A rejoinder to Baumrind. Child Development, 57, 522–526.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 30
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Fall 2006



The Emotional Intelligence, Moral Judgment, and Leadership of Academically Gifted Adolescents

Seon-Young Lee & Paula Olszewski-Kubilius

Using 3 psychological scales, this study examined the level of emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of more than 200 gifted high school students who participated in an accelerative academic program or an enrichment leadership program through a university-based gifted institute. Major findings include that on emotional intelligence, gifted males were comparable to students in the age normative sample, while gifted females lagged behind the norm group. Regardless of gender, gifted students had higher scores on adaptability but lower scores on stress management and impulse control ability compared to the normative sample. On moral judgment, gifted students were comparable to the level of individuals with master’s or professional degrees, and they showed an above-average level of leadership compared to the normative sample. No differences were found in students’ scores on the 3 scales by the type of program (academic versus leadership).


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.