User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 29 |  Issue 3 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Anderssen, E. C., Myburgh, C. P. H., van Zyl, M. A., & Wiid, A. J. B. (1992). A differential analysis of time-use attitudes of high school students. Adolescence, 27, 64–72.
  • Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57.
  • Bowles, T. (1999). Focusing on time orientation to explain adolescent self-concept and academic achievement: Part II. Testing a model. Journal of Applied Health Behavior, 1, 1–8.
  • Brown, W. T., & Jones, J. M. (2004). The substance of things hoped for: A study of the future orientation, minority status perceptions, academic engagement, and academic performance of Black high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 248–273.
  • Cartron-Guerin, A., & Levy, P. (1980). Achievement and future time perspective among preadolescents: Range, nature, and optimism of future plans. Bulletin de Psychologie, 33, 747–753.
  • Cottle, J. T. (1967). Adolescent perceptions of time: The effect of age, sex, and social class. Journal of Personality, 37, 636–650.
  • De Volder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566–571.
  • Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293–312.
  • Gonzalez, A., & Zimbardo, P. (1985). Time in perspective: A Psychology Today survey report. Psychology Today, 19, 21–26.
  • Greene, A. L. (1986). Future-time perspective in adolescence: The present of things future revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 99–113.
  • Greene, A. L., & Wheatley, S. M. (1992). “I’ve got a lot to do and I don’t think I’ll have the time”: Gender differences in late adolescents’ narratives of the future. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 667–686.
  • Groth, N. J. (1972). Achievement of autonomy and other developmental tasks in bright and average adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64, 290–293.
  • Harris, K. M., Duncan, G. J., & Boisjoly, J. (2002). Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risk behavior in adolescence. Social Forces, 80, 1005–1039.
  • Honora, D. (2002). The relationship of gender and achievement to future outlook among African American adolescents. Adolescence, 37, 301–316.
  • Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125.
  • Kalakoski, V., & Nurmi, J. (1998). Identity and educational transitions: Age differences in adolescent exploration and commitment related to education, occupation, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 29–47.
  • Klineberg, S. L. (1967). Changes in outlook on the future between childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 185–193.
  • Lamm, H., Schmidt, R. W., & Trommsdorff, G. (1976). Sex and social class as determinants of future orientation (time perspective) in adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 317–326.
  • Lennings, C. L., Burns, A. M., & Cooney, G. (1998). The profiles of time perspective and personality: Developmental considerations. Journal of Psychology, 132, 629–641.
  • Lessing, E. E. (1972). Extensions of personal future time perspective, age, and life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 6, 457–468.
  • Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. The American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–897.
  • Lewin, K. (1942). Time perspective and morale. In K. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science (pp. 80–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lomranz, J., Friedman, A., Gitter, G., Shmotkin, D., & Medini, G. (1985). The meaning of time-related concepts across the life-span: An Israeli sample. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 21, 87–107.
  • McCabe, K., & Barnett, D. (2000). First comes work, then comes marriage: Future orientation among African American young adolescents. Family Relations, 49, 63–70.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). Educational equity for girls and women (NCES 2000–030). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Phalet, K., Andriessen, I., & Lens, W. (2004). How future goals enhance motivation and learning in multicultural classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 59–89.
  • Piaget, J. (1955). The development of time concepts in the child. In P. H. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.), Psychopathology of childhood (pp. 34–44). London: Grube and Stratton.
  • Piaget, J. (1975). The intellectual development of the adolescent. In A. H. Esman (Ed.), The psychology of the adolescence: Essential readings (pp. 104–108). New York: International Universities Press.
  • Shmotkin, D. (1991). The role of time orientation in life satisfaction across the life span. Journal of Gerontology, 46, 243–250.
  • Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481–506.
  • Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheaverns, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams, V. H., & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 820–826.
  • Tehan, J. E. (1957). Future time perspective, optimism, and academic achievement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 379–380.
  • Tismar, K. G. (1987). Psychological aspects of temporal dominance during adolescence. Psychological Reports, 61, 647–654.
  • Trommsdorff, G. (1983). Future orientation and socialization. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 381–406.
  • Trommsdorff, G., Burger, C., & Fuchsle, T. (1982). Social and psychological aspects of future orientation. In M. Irle (Ed.), Studies in decision making (pp. 167–194). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
  • Trommsdorff, G., Lamm, H., & Schmidt, R. W. (1979). A longitudinal study of adolescents’ future orientation (time perspective). Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8, 131–147.
  • Verstraeten, D. (1980). Level of realism in adolescent future time perspective. Human Development, 23, 177–191.
  • Webb, J. T., & Mayers, B. S. (1974). Developmental aspects of temporal orientation in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 504–507.
  • Wessman, A. E., & Gorman, B. S. (1977). The personal experience of time. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Worrell, F. C., & Hale, R. L. (2001). The relationship of hope in the future and perceived school climate to school completion. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 370–388.
  • Worrell, F. C., Latto, I. K., & Perlinski, M. A. (1999). The relationship of risk status to self-esteem and perceived life chances. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 5(2), 33–38.
  • Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2005). Reliability and validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Scores in academically talented adolescents. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Wyman, P. A., Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., & Kerley, J. H. (1993). The role of children’s future expectations in self-system functioning and adjustment to life stress: A perspective study of urban at-risk children. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 649–661.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-difference metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risk driving. Personality and Individual Difference, 23, 1007–1023.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 29
  •  Issue 3
  • Publication Date: Spring 2006



The Relationship of Time Perspective to Age, Gender, and Academic Achievement Among Academically Talented Adolescents

Zena R. Mello & Frank C. Worrell

Time perspective is a useful psychological construct associated with educational outcomes (Phalet, Andriessen, & Lens, 2004) and may prove fruitful for research focusing on academically talented adolescents. Thus, the relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement was examined among 722 academically talented middle and high school students. Time perspective was measured using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI; Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999). Regression analyses yielded several significant results: An increase in age was associated with present hedonism, females had fewer negative thoughts about the future than males, and academic achievement was negatively associated with present fatalistic attitudes and positively associated with future positive attitudes. Findings support the examination of time perspective as a multidimensional construct including past, present, and future orientations in academically talented populations. Implications of these results for educational and developmental theory and practice are discussed.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.