Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Anastasi, A. (1958). Heredity, environment, and the question “How?” Psychological Review, 65, 197–208.
  • Blackshaw, S., Fraioli, R. E., Furukawa, T., & Cepko, C. L. (2001). Comprehensive analysis of photoreceptor gene expression and the identification of candidate retinal disease genes. Cell, 107, 579–589.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1993). Heredity, environment, and the question “how.” In R. Plomin & G. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture, & psychology (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: APA Books.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
  • Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., Taylor, A., & Poulton, R. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–855.
  • Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ceci, S. J., Barnett, S. M., & Kanaya, T. (2003). Developing childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The Psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 126–158). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap-closing: When the “have nots” gain, but the “haves” gain more. American Psychologist, 60, 149–160.
  • Detterman, D. K. (1993). Giftedness and intelligence: One and the same? In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability: CIBA Foundation Symposium 178 (pp. 22–43). Chicester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108, 346–369.
  • Drillien, C. M. (1964). Growth and development of the prematurely born infant. London: E. & S. Livingstone.
  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ericsson K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1999). Becoming an expert—training or talent? In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams, (Eds.). The nature-nurture debate: The essential readings (pp. 200–255). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Heizmann, S. (1993). Can we create gifted people? In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
  • Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. David (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
  • Ginsburg, E., & Livshits, G. (1999). Segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Annals of Human Biology, 26, 103–129.
  • Harrod, R. F. (1936). The trade cycle. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
  • Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1997). The puzzle of nongenetic variance. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 42–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Platt, R. (1966). General introduction. In J. E. Meade & A. S. Parkes (Eds.), Genetic and environmental factors in human ability (pp. ix–xi). Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Craig, I. W., & McGuffin, P. (2003). Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Samuelson, P. (1939). Interactions between the multiplier analysis and principles of acceleration. Review of Economic Statistics, 21(2), 75–78.
  • Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394–403.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116–136). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.
  • Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 39–43.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
  • Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 28
  •  Issue 3-4
  • Publication Date: Spring 2005



The Nature and Nurture of Talent: A Bioecological Perspective on the Ontogeny of Exceptional Abilities

Paul B. Papierno, Stephen J. Ceci, Matthew C. Makel, & Wendy M. Williams

Despite extensive research, questions underlying the nature and nurture of talent remain both numerous and diverse. In the current paper, we present an account that addresses 2 of the primary questions inspired by this debate: (a) the very existence of innate talents and (b) how exceptional abilities are developed. The development of exceptional performance is addressed through a synthesis of recent models that invoke multiplier effects to explain how differences in initial conditions (e.g., different levels of innate abilities), coupled with gene-environment interactions, determine ranges of phenotypic outcomes.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.