Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in the development of musically gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388–413). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. G. (2000). Counseling gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 595–607). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Coleman, L. J. (2003). Gifted child pedagogy: Meaningful chimera? Roeper Review, 25, 163–164.
  • Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2000). Social-emotional development and the personal experience of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 203–212). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Dai, D. Y. (2005). Reductionism versus emergentism: A framework for understanding conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 27, 144–151.
  • Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45–63.
  • Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 109, 764–771.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educaitonal programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 271–282). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Feldman, D. H. (1992). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education: Some thoughts on a changing national scene. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from 1991 Henry and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89–94). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
  • Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gagné, F. (1985). Gifted and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.
  • Johnsen, S. K. (2003). Issues in the assessment of talent development. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 201–214). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Kaplan, S. (2003). Is there a gifted-child pedagogy? Roeper Review, 25, 165.
  • Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164–180.
  • Mönks, F. J., & Mason, E. J. (2000). Developmental psychology and giftedness: Theories and research. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 141–155). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Moon, S. M., & Rosselli, H. C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 499–521). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review, 19, 4–12.
  • Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. Columbus, OH: Macmillan/Merrill.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3–54.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Dai, D. Y. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 930–936). New York: Macmillan Reference.
  • Shavinina, L. V., & Seeratan, K. L. (2004). Extracognitive phenomena in the intellectual functioning of gifted, creative, and talented individuals. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Snow, R. E. (1994). Aptitude development and talent achievement. In N. Colangelo, S. C. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 101–120). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Subotnik, R. F., & Coleman, L. J. (1996). Establishing the foundations for a talent development school: Applying principles to creating an ideal. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 175–189.
  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1, Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Treffinger, D. S., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181–193.
  • Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 306–331). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
  • Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Zuckerman, H. (1983). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 241–252). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 28
  •  Issue 3-4
  • Publication Date: Spring 2005



Epilogue: Conclusions and Implications for Gifted Education

David Yun Dai & Laurence J. Coleman

This epilogue draws general conclusions regarding the role of nature and nurture in the development of exceptional competence. Then, implications of the nature-nurture debate and research on gifted education are discussed in terms of 2 alternative paradigms: the gifted-child paradigm and the talent-development paradigm. More specifically, we attempt to elucidate how ideas expressed in preceding articles reinforce a talent-development orientation along 5 major dimensions of gifted education: (a) programming, (b) identification, (c) curriculum, (d) teaching, and (e) counseling.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.