Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Baker, J. A. (1995). Depression and suicidal ideation among academically talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 218–233.
  • Betts, G. (1986). Development of the emotional and social needs of gifted individuals. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 587–589.
  • Butcher, J. N., & Williams, C. L. (1992). Essentials of MMPI-2 and MMPI-A interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Graham, J. R., Archer, R. P., Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Cohn, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  • Coleman, M., & Fults, B. (1982). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 116–119.
  • Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2000). Social-emotional development and the experience of being gifted. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 203–212). New York: Pergamon.
  • Coleman, L., & Cross, T. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Cross, T. L. (1997). Psychological and social aspects of educating gifted students. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 180–200.
  • Cross, T., Coleman, L., & Stewart, R. (1995). Psycho-social diversity of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of the giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 16, 37–40.
  • Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Terhaar-Yonkers, M. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55.
  • Dally, P. J., & Gomez, J. (1979). Anorexia nervosa. London: Heinemann.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Delisle, J. R. (1990). The gifted adolescent at risk: Strategies and resources for suicide prevention among gifted youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 212–228.
  • Dixon, D. N., & Scheckel, J. R. (1996). Gifted adolescent suicide: The empirical base. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 386–392.
  • Dixon, F., Cross, T., & Adams, C. (2001). Psychological characteristics of academically gifted students in a residential setting: A cluster analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 433–447.
  • Dixon, F., Lapsley, D., & Hanchon, T. (2004). A typology of gifted adolescent perfectionism. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 95–106.
  • Freeman, J. (1994). Some emotional aspects of being gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 180–197.
  • Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually developed children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179–183.
  • Gowan, J. C., & Demos, G. D. (1964). Emotionally maladjusted gifted children. In J. Gowan & P. Torrance (Eds.), Educational and guidance of the ablest. Itasca, IL: C. C. Thomas.
  • Gust-Brey, K., & Cross, T. (1999). An examination of the literature base on the suicidal behaviors of gifted students. Roeper Review, 22, 28–35.
  • Hayes, M. L., & Sloat, R. S. (1989). Gifted students at risk for suicide. Roeper Review, 12, 202–207.
  • Howard-Hamilton, M., & Franks, B. A. (1995). Gifted adolescents: Psychological behaviors, values, and developmental implications. Roeper Review, 17, 186–191.
  • Howley, C., Howley, A., & Pendarvis, E. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Kaiser, C. F., Berndt, D. J., & Stanley, G. (1987, November). Moral judgment and depression in gifted adolescents. Paper presented at the annual World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children. Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Lajoie, S. P., & Shore, B. M. (1981). Three myths? The over-representation of the gifted among dropouts, delinquents, and suicides. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 183–243.
  • Lea-Wood, S. S., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1995). Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australian Schools. Roper Review, 17, 195–197.
  • Lehman, E., & Erdwins, C. (1981). The social and emotional adjustment of young, intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 134–137.
  • Levine, E., & Tucker, S. (1986). Emotional needs of gifted children: A preliminary phenomenological view. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 156–165.
  • Mallis, J. (1986). Diamonds in the dust. Austin, TX: Multimedia Arts.
  • Marsh, H. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280–295.
  • Marsh, H., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.
  • Myers, R., & Pace, T. (1986) Counseling gifted and talented students: Historical perspectives and contemporary issues. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 548–551.
  • Nail, J. M., & Evans, J. G. (1997). The emotional adjustment of gifted adolescents: A view of global functioning. Roeper Review, 20, 18–21.
  • Neihart, M. (1991). Anxiety and depression in high ability and average ability adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
  • Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological wellbeing: What does the empirical literature say. Roeper Review, 22, 10–17.
  • Oram, G. D., Dewey, D. G., & Rutemiller, L. A. (1995). Relations between academic aptitude and psychosocial adjustment in gifted program students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 236–244.
  • Parker, W. (1996). Psychological adjustment in mathematically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 154–157.
  • Parker, W. D., & Adkins, K. K. (1995). Perfectionism and the gifted. Roeper Review, 17, 173–176.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Rakow, S. (1989, March). Gifted . . . and puberty too. Middle School Journal, 18–19.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Bradley, M. (1993). Emotional stability of intellectually superior children verses nongifted peers as estimated by chronic anxiety levels. School Psychology Review, 12, 190–194.
  • Roeper, A. (1992). Characteristics of gifted children and how parents and teachers can cope with them. Roeper Review, 11, 31–32.
  • Scholwinski, E., & Reynolds, C. R. (1985). Dimensions of anxiety among high IQ children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 125–130.
  • Tannenbaum, A. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
  • Terman, L. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic studies of genius, Vol. IV. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Touyz, S. W., Beumont, P. J. V., & Johnstone, L. C. (1986). Neuropsychological correlates of dieting disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 1025–1034.
  • Webb, J., Meckstroth, E., & Tolan, S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child. Columbus: Ohio Psychological Publishing.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 28
  •  Issue 2
  • Publication Date: Winter 2004



Psychological Characteristics of Academically Gifted Adolescents Attending a Residential Academy: A Longitudinal Study

Tracy L. Cross, Cheryll Adams, Felicia Dixon, & Jason Holland

Students attending a state-supported residential academy for academically gifted adolescents (N = 139) completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory for Adolescents (MMPI-A; Butcher et al., 1992) upon entrance to document their psychological characteristics. The same students completed a postadministration of the MMPI-A at the end of their 2nd year at the school. Results indicated that the gifted students were quite similar to the normative group of adolescents on the MMPI-A. While several statistically significant changes were observed over time, the effect-size calculations accounted for only a modest percentage of the variance in all cases. Scores on the 2nd administration of the MMPI-A declined among the majority of students who manifested elevated scores on the initial administration.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.