User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 28 |  Issue 1 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • 3Abel, T., & Karnes, F. A. (1993). Self-perceived strengths in leadership abilities between suburban and rural gifted students using the Leadership Strengths Indicator. Psychological Reports, 73, 687–690.
  • Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. (2004). Test reviews online. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.unl.edu/buros.
  • Carter, K. R., & Swanson, H. L. (1990). An analysis of the most frequently cited gifted journal articles since the Marland Report: Implications for researchers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 116–123.
  • Cawood, J. (1983). The gifted child: Tomorrow’s leader? The development of leadership potential in all children. Gifted International, 2, 129–153.
  • 2Chan, D. W. (2000a). Assessing leadership among Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: The use of Roets Rating Scale for leadership. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 115–122.
  • 1Chan, D. W. (2000b). Developing the Creative Leadership Training Program for gifted and talented students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 22, 94–97.
  • 1Chan, D. W. (2003). Leadership skills training for Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: Does training make a difference? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 166–174.
  • 1Charitat, M. (1988). A program of leadership development. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 17–19.
  • Chauvin, J. C. (1988). Mentoring: A powerful force in leadership development. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 24–25.
  • 2Chauvin, J. C., & Karnes, F. A. (1982). Reliability of a leadership inventory used with gifted students. Psychological Reports, 51, 770.
  • 2Chauvin, J. C., & Karnes, F. A. (1983). A leadership profile of secondary gifted students. Psychological Reports, 53, 1259–1262.
  • 3Chauvin, J. C., & Karnes, F. A. (1984). Perceptions of leadership characteristics by gifted elementary students. Roeper Review, 6, 238–239.
  • Cohn, S. (1977). A model for a pluralistic view of giftedness and talent. Unpublished paper prepared for the U.S. Office of Education.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  • Delisle, J. R. (1994). The top ten statements that should never again be made by advocates of gifted children. Gifted Child Today, 17(2), 34–35, 42.
  • Díaz, E. I. (2002). Framing an historical context for the education of culturally and linguistically diverse students with gifted potential: 1850s to 1980s. In J. A. Castellano & E. I. Díaz (Eds.), Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 1–28). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • 2Edmunds, A. L. (1998). Content, concurrent, and construct validity of the Leadership Skills Inventory. Roeper Review, 20, 281–284.
  • 2Edmunds, A. L., & Yewchuk, C. R. (1996). Indicators of leadership in gifted grade twelve students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 345–355.
  • Educational Testing Service. (2003). ETS Test Link: World’s largest test collection database. Retrieved August 5, 2003, from http://testcollection.ets.org/cgi/swebmnu.exe?act=3&ini=TestC oll.
  • Ellis, J. L. (1990). Leadership Strengths Indicator: A self-report leadership analysis instrument for adolescents. Monroe, NY: Trillium.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). A conception of talent and talent development. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 193–209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Kennedy, D. M. (1988a). Observing the nature and emergence of leadership talent among gifted youth. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 2–7.
  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Kennedy, D. M. (1988b). Preparing gifted youth for leadership roles in a rapidly changing society. Roeper Review, 10, 226–230.
  • 2Feldhusen, J. F., & Pleiss, M. K. (1994). Leadership: A synthesis of social skills, creativity, and histrionic ability? Roeper Review, 16, 292–293.
  • Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 1Follis, H., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1983). Design and evaluation of a summer academic, leadership program. Roeper Review, 6, 92–94.
  • Foster, W. (1981). Leadership: A conceptual framework for recognizing and educating. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 17–25.
  • Friedman, P. G. (1980). Teaching the gifted and talented oral communication and leadership. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
  • 2Friedman, P. G., Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Van Dyke, M. (1984). Identifying the leadership gifted: Self, peer, or teacher nominations? Roeper Review, 7, 91–94.
  • 1Gonsalves, W. C., Grimm, J., & Welsh, J. M. (1981). Leadership training: A lesson in living. Roeper Review, 3(3), 16–19.
  • Hambach, P. A. (1988). Finding leadership in the G/C/T classroom. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 49–50.
  • Hays, T. S. (1993). An historical content analysis of publications in gifted education journals. Roeper Review, 16, 41–43.
  • Huckaby, W. O., & Sperling, H. B. (1981). Leadership giftedness: An idea whose time has not yet come. Roeper Review, 3(3), 19–22.
  • Jarecky, R. K. (1959). Identification of the socially gifted. Exceptional Children, 25, 415–419.
  • Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336.
  • Karnes, F. A. (Ed.). (1988). Leadership training: A call to arms [special section]. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 1–53.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (1996). Leadership and the gifted. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29(1), 1–12.
  • 3Karnes, F. A., Bean, S. M., & McGinnis, J. C. (1994/1995). Perceptions of leadership held by young females. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 113–119.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Chauvin, J. C. (1985). Leadership Skills Inventory: Administration manual and manual of leadership activities. East Aurora, NY: DOK.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Chauvin, J. C. (2000). Leadership development program. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
  • 2Karnes, F. A., Chauvin, J. C., & Trant, T. J. (1985). Validity of the leadership potential score of the High School Personality Questionnaire with talented students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 163–166.
  • 2Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1988a). Assessment of the concurrent validity of the Leadership Skills Inventory with gifted students and their teachers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 59–62.
  • 2Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1988b). Assessment of the criterion-related validity of the Leadership Skills Inventory. Psychological Reports, 62, 263–267.
  • 3Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1989a). Leadership positions and sex role stereotyping among gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 76–78.
  • 3Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1989b). Student leaders’ and their parents’ perceptions of the home environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 165–167.
  • Karnes, F. A., & McGinnis, J. C. (1996). Scores on indicators of leadership skills, locus of control, and self-actualization for student leaders in grades 6 to 10. Psychological Reports, 78, 1235–1240.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Meriweather, S. (1988). Teacher trainers’ views on leadership. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 8–10.
  • 1Karnes, F. A., & Meriweather, S. (1989). Developing and implementing a plan for leadership: An integral component for success as a leader. Roeper Review, 11, 214–217.
  • 2Karnes, F. A., Meriweather, S., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1987). The effectiveness of the Leadership Studies Program. Roeper Review, 9, 238–241.
  • 3Karnes, F. A., Riley, T. L., & McGinnis, J. C. (1996). Perceptions of great leaders held by gifted youth. Gifted Child Today, 19(4), 14–15, 50.
  • Kitano, M. K., & Tafoya, N. (1982). Preschool leadership: A review and critique. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 5, 78–89.
  • 4Kitano, M. K., & Tafoya, N. (1984). Preschool children’s perceptions of leadership and how it works. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 7, 77–89.
  • Kobe, L. M., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Rickers, J. D. (2001). Self-reported leadership experiences in relation to inventoried social and emotional intelligence. Current Psychology, 20, 154–163.
  • 4Landau, E., & Weissler, K. (1991). Tracing leadership in gifted children. The Journal of Psychology, 125, 681–688.
  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • 2Myers, M. R., Slavin, M. J., & Southern, W. T. (1990). Emergence and maintenance of leadership among gifted students in group problem solving. Roeper Review, 12, 256–261.
  • Oakland, T., Falkenberg, B. A., & Oakland, C. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth, and adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 138–146.
  • Passow, A. H. (1988). Styles of leadership training . . . and some more thoughts. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 34–38.
  • Pasternack, M., & Silvey, L. (1969). Leadership patterns in gifted peer groups. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 126–128.
  • 2Perez, G. S., Chassin, D., Ellington, C., & Smith, J. A. (1982). Leadership giftedness in preschool children. Roeper Review, 4(3), 26–28.
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161–169.
  • Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Piirto, J. (2002). “Motivation is first—then they can do anything”: Portrait of an Indian school for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 181–192.
  • Plowman, P. D. (1981). Training extraordinary leaders. Roeper Review, 3(3), 13–16.
  • Plucker, J. A. (1997). Debunking the myth of the “highly significant” result: Effect sizes in gifted education research. Roeper Review, 20, 122–126.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.
  • Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., & Hartman, R. K. (1976). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • 3Riley, T. L., & Karnes, F. A. (1994). Intellectually gifted elementary students’ perceptions of leadership. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 47–50.
  • 4Roach, A. A., Wyman, L. T., Brookes, H., Chavez, C., Heath, S. B., & Valdes, G. (1999). Leadership giftedness: Models revisited. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 13–24.
  • Roets, L. F. (1988). Leadership: A skills training program. Des Moines, IA: Leadership Publishers.
  • Roets, L. F. (1991). Roets Rating Scale for Leadership (RRSL): A self-rating scale for students grades 5–12. Des Moines, IA: Leadership Publishers.
  • Ross, J. A., & Smyth, E. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: A case for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63–82.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1985). Intelligence and personal influence in groups: Four nonlinear models. Psychological Review, 92, 532–547.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1995). Personality and intellectual predictors of leadership. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 739–757). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Sisk, D. A. (1987). Leadership Skills and Behaviors Scale. In D. A. Sisk & H. Rosselli (Eds.), Leadership: A special type of giftedness (pp. 102–106). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
  • 1Smith, D. L., Smith, L., & Barnette, J. (1991). Exploring the development of leadership giftedness. Roeper Review, 14, 7–12.
  • 4Smyth, E., & Ross, J. A. (1999). Developing leadership skills of preadolescent gifted learners in small group settings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 204–211.
  • Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219–238.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Vroom, V. (2002). The person versus the situation in leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 301–323.
  • Taylor, C. W., & Ellison, R. L. (1983). Searching for student talent resources relevant to our USDE types of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 99–106.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly? A philosophy of creativity. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • 3Wade, R. C., & Putnam, K. (1995). Tomorrow’s leaders? Gifted students’ opinions of leadership and service activities. Roeper Review, 18, 150–151.
  • Wallace, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Development and effects of transformational leadership in adolescents. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 211–226.
  • Ziegler, A., & Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11, 113–136.
  • Zinskie, C. D. (2003, April). Evaluating the impact of service-learning on the leadership ability of gifted middle school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 28
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Fall 2004



Leadership Education for Gifted and Talented Youth: A Review of the Literature

Michael S. Matthews

Leadership has been retained in the federal definition of giftedness, across major revisions, since its inclusion in the Marland Report (1972) definition more than 30 years ago. Despite this history, there appears to be little consensus regarding the relationship between leadership education and education for talented and gifted youth. This review analyzes publications about leadership education among talented and gifted students since 1980. Four major emphases are identified within this literature, and empirical articles within each area of emphasis are summarized and critiqued. Analysis confirms that a consolidated theoretical framework for leadership giftedness has not yet materialized, although limited consensus may be emerging regarding the aspects of leadership that are more or less responsive to instruction. Findings suggest that more research may be needed to justify retaining leadership ability within the federal definition of giftedness. Three suggested directions for future research on youth leadership giftedness are extrapolated from this foundation.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.