Abstract
- Bar-Tal, D. (1978). Attributional analysis of achievement-related behavior. Review of Educational Research, 48, 259–271.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Brown, E. J., Heimberg, R. G., Frost, R. O., Makris, G. S., Juster, H. R., & Leung, A. W. (1999). Relationship of perfectionism to affect, expectations, attributions, and performance in the classroom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 98–120.
- Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Dweck, C. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.
- Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
- Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Pickering, D. (1998). Perfectionism in relation to attributions for success or failure. Current Psychology, 17, 249–262.
- Frost, R. P., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468.
- Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456–470.
- Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1996). Personality traits and the coping process. In M. Zeidner & N. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping (pp. 400–433). London: Wiley.
- Juster, H., Heimberg, R., Frost, R., Holt, C., Mattia, J., & Faccenda, K. (1996). Social phobia and perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 403–410.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Payne, S. (1999). Interviewing in qualitative research. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 89–102). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Platt, C. (1998). Effects of attributions for success on first-term college performance: A covariance structure model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 569–578.
- Robinson, N. (2002). Individual differences in gifted students’ attributions for academic performance. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 61–70). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1–20.
- Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Volume 27
- Issue 4
- Publication Date: Summer 2004
Interpreting Successes and Failures: The Influence of Perfectionism on Perspective
Kristie L. Speirs Neumeister
The findings reported in this article are part of a larger study investigating perfectionism in gifted college students. This qualitative interview study examined differences in the interpretation of successes and failures between gifted college students scoring high on either socially prescribed or self-oriented perfectionism. Findings indicated that socially prescribed perfectionists tended to minimize their successes. They made internal attributions for failure, and they overgeneralized and inflated its ramifications. In contrast, self-oriented perfectionists took pride in their successes and made internal attributions for them. With regard to their failures, they made attributions that were situation-specific, and they were able to keep them in perspective. However, they did report frustration and anger when confronting a failure in a situation where they had applied their greatest effort. Based on these findings, implications for future research and recommendations for parents and educators of gifted children are suggested.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.