Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Ball, W. H., & Brewer, P. F. (1996). Socratic seminars. In R. L. Canady & M. D. Rettig (Eds.), Teaching in the block (pp. 29–64). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
  • Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence (CREDE). (2001, September). Some program alternatives for English language learners. Retrieved April 9, 2002, from the CREDE Web site: http://www.cal.org/crede/pubs/PracBrief3.htm.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
  • Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454–470.
  • Granada, A. J. (2002). Addressing the curriculum, instruction, and assessment needs of the gifted bilingual/bicultural student. In J. A. Castellano & E. I Diaz (Eds.), Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 133–153). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? Santa Barbara, CA: Linguistic Minority Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443275).
  • Jiménez, R. T. (2002). Fostering the literacy development of Latino students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(6), 1–10.
  • Kitano, M. K., & Espinosa, R. (1995). Language diversity and giftedness: Working with gifted English language learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 234–254.
  • Krashen, S. (1997). Why bilingual education? ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED403101).
  • Kreuger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Ogawa, R. T., & Malen, B. (1991). Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literature. Applying the exploratory case study method. Review of Educational Research, 61, 265–286.
  • Robisheaux, J. A. (2002). The intersection of language, high potential, and culture in gifted English as a second language students. In J. A. Castellano & E. I Diaz (Eds.), Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 154–174). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Stepien, W. J., & Pyke, S. L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 380–400.
  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (1997/98). Two languages are better than one. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 23–26.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 26
  •  Issue 2
  • Publication Date: Winter 2002



Action Research and Practical Inquiry Teaching Gifted English Learners

Margie K. Kitano & Katie S. Pedersen

Teachers of the gifted in a highly diverse urban district frequently request information on methods for working with English learners. To meet this need, 12 teachers of the gifted who serve English learners participated in focus groups designed to glean practitioner knowledge concerning effective approaches. Participating teachers characterized gifted English learners as enthusiastic, high-level thinkers who have difficulty expressing their ideas in English. They recommended strategies consistent with identified needs and with the literature on best practices for the general population of English learners. Their examples show deft synthesis of challenge appropriate for gifted learners and research-based strategies for English learners.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.