User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 25 |  Issue 1 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Amabile, T. (1989). Growing up creative. Buffalo, NY: C.E.F. Press.
  • Brown, G. (1999). Postmodernism and creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 1 (pp. 423–428). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Cropley, A. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21, 253–260.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Dacey, J., & Lennon, K. (1998). Understanding creativity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretive ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 2 (pp. 525–531). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
  • Gibbs, R. (1999). Metaphors. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 1 (pp. 209–219). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburg: University of Edinburg, Scotland: Social Sciences Research Center.
  • Hausman, C. (1987). Philosophical perspectives on the study of creativity. In S. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 380–389). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
  • Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • MacKinnon, D. (1988). Architects, personality types, and creativity. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 175–189) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). New York: Plenum.
  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mumford, M., Connelly, M., Baughman, W., & Marks, M. (1994). Creativity and problem solving: Cognition, adaptability, and wisdom. Roeper Review, 16, 241–246.
  • Patrick, C. (1988). Creative thought in artists. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 73–79). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Piirto, J. (1998). Themes in the lives of successful contemporary U.S. women creative writers. Roeper Review, 21, 60–70.
  • Radman, Z. (1997). Metaphors: Figures of the mind. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Raehalme, O. (1996). Lahjakas nainen [Gifted women]. Hämeenlinna, Finland: Karisto Oy.
  • Richardson, L. (1985). The new other woman: Contemporary single women in affairs with married men. New York: The Free Press.
  • Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roe, A. (1988). Psychological approaches to creativity in science. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 165–175). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Rogers, C. (1988). Toward a theory of creativity. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 296–305). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Root-Bernstein, R. (1999). Discovery. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 1 (pp. 559–571). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Rothenberg, A. (1988). The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 311–327). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Sawyer, R. K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). Social influences on the creative process: An autobiographical memory study of creativity through the lifespan. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & D. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development: Vol. 2 (pp. 467–471). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Shaughnessy, M. (1998). An interview with E. Paul Torrance: About creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 441–452.
  • Simonton, D. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1988). A behavioral model of creation. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., 267–273). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Starko, A. (1995). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Talburt, S. (1999). Interpretation becoming other: A response to Leslie Bloom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 615–621.
  • Walberg, H., & Stariha, W. (1992). Productive human capital: Learning, creativity, and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 323–340.
  • Wallas, G. (1988). Stages in the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (6th ed., pp. 69–73). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1991). Metaphors in motivation and attribution. American Psychologist, 46, 921–930.
  • Weisberg, R. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 148–174). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 25
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Fall 2001
  • Page Number(s): 32-51
  • DOI: 10.4219/jeg-2001-210



Creative Game in Science

Mirka Koro-Ljungberg

In this article, the metaphor of game provides insights into how successful Finnish scientists defined and depicted their creative processes. Data were juxtaposed from 26 life-story interviews of recognized scientists to reflect the complexity and individuality of the creative endeavor. Various stages and characteristics of creative processes are described in the form of a collective-data story, a collage-like dialogue that creates multiple layers of meanings to illustrate the creativity game and its elements (various roles, backstage work, rules of domain, and individual engagement).


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
You have 4 item(s) in your cart.
Last item you added is
The Collaboration of Mathematically Gifted Students on Challenging Tasks.

View Cart