Abstract
- Adams, J., Priest, R. F., & Prince, H. T. (1985). Achievement motive: Analyzing the validity of the WOFO. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 357–370.
- Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
- Berk, L. E. (2000). Child development (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Brooks, L., Holahan, W., & Galligan, M. (1985). The effects of a nontraditional role-modeling intervention on sex typing of occupational preferences and career salience in adolescent females. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 264–276.
- Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
- Elmen, J. (1991). Achievement orientation in early adolescence: Developmental patterns and social correlates. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 125–151.
- Galambos, N. L., Peterson, A. C., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–357.
- Harter, S. (1990). Processes underlying adolescent self-concept formation. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? (pp. 205–239). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Hay, C. A., & Bakken, L. (1991). Gifted sixth-grade girls: Similarities and differences in attitudes among gifted girls, nongifted peers, and their mothers. Roeper Review, 13, 158–160.
- Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 35.
- Hollinger, C. L. (1983). Counseling the gifted and talented female adolescent: The relationship between social self-esteem and traits of instrumentality and expressiveness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 157–161.
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
- Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1983). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 149–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Karnes, F. A., & Wherry, G. N. (1981). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 49, 903–906.
- Kerr, B. A. (1995). Smart girls two. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
- Lamke, L. K. (1982). The impact of sex-role orientation on self-esteem in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1530–1535.
- Li, A. K. F. (1988). Self-perception and motivational orientation in gifted children. Roeper Review, 10, 175–180.
- Loeb, R. C., & Jay, G. (1987). Self-concept in gifted children: Differential impact in boys and girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 9–14.
- Nash, S. C. (1979). Sex role as a mediator of intellectual functioning. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning (pp. 263–302). New York: Academic Press.
- Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., & Krasney, N. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 347–352.
- Reis, S. M., & Callahan, C. M. (1996). My boyfriend, my girlfriend, or me: The dilemma of talented teenaged girls. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 434–446.
- Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38, 243–248.
- Robison-Awana, P., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. R. (1986). But what about smart girls? Adolescent self-esteem and sex role perceptions as a function of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 179–183.
- Silverman, L. K. (1994/95). To be gifted or feminine: The forced choice of adolescence. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, Winter, 141–156.
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Stevens, G., & Featherman, D. L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10, 364–395.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical abstracts of the U.S.: 1992 (112th ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1983). Profiles of precocity: The 1982 midwest talent search finalists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 139–144.
- Volume 24
- Issue 2
- Publication Date: Winter 2000
Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs
Linda M. Raffaele Mendez
The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted group was significantly higher in socioeconomic status than the general education group, this variable was covaried in the analyses. Results showed that girls in the gifted education program held stronger self-perceptions of instrumentality (or stereotypically masculine personality attributes), evidenced higher achievement motivation, were less traditional in their career aspirations, and were more liberal toward the rights and roles of women than their peers in general education. The two groups did not differ significantly on self-perceptions of expressiveness (or stereotypically feminine personality traits), degree of competitiveness, or fear of success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding differences in gender-role stereotyping and achievementrelated choices between girls in gifted and general education programs.
Cart Summary
Your cart is empty.