User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Journal For The Education Of The Gifted > Volume 24 |  Issue 2 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Ahsen, A. (1984). ISM: The triple code model for imagery and psychophysiology. Journal of Mental Imagery, 8(4), 15–42.
  • Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Bohm, D. (1982). The physicist and the mystic: Is a dialog between them possible? (Interview by R. Weber; Edited by E. Sellon). In K. Wilber (Ed.), The holographic paradigm and other paradoxes (pp. 187–214). Boston: Shambhala.
  • Capra, F. (1976). The Tao of physics. New York: Bantam.
  • Comfort, A. (1984). Reality and empathy: Physics, mind, and science in the twenty-first century. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and opinions. New York: Bonanza Books.
  • Ernest, C. H. (1977). Imagery ability, and cognition: A critical review. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2, 181–216.
  • Fillmer, H. T., & Parkay, F. W. (1990, May). Imagery: A neglected correlate of reading instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 039).
  • Forisha, B. L. (1978). Mental imagery and creativity: Review and speculations. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2, 209–238.
  • Gardner, H. (1985) Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
  • Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenological and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  • Giorgi, A. (1986). Theoretical justification for the use of description in psychological research. In R. Ashworth, A. Giorgi, & A. J. de Koning (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 3–22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  • Giorgi, A. (1989). One type of analysis of descriptive data: Procedures involved in following a scientific phenomenological method. Method, 39–61.
  • Harman, W., & Rheingold, H. (1984). Higher creativity: Liberating the unconscious for breakthrough insights. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
  • Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time. New York: Bantam.
  • Hermelin, B., & O’Connor, N. (1986). Spatial representations in mathematically and in artistically gifted children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 150–157.
  • Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). New York: Collier. (Original work published 1931).
  • Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason. (N. Kemp-Smith, Trans.). New York: Random House.
  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1985). Mental imagery ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 151–172). New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1991). Neuropsychological components of imagery processing, final technical report. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 213).
  • Koussy, A. A. H. El (1935). An investigation into the factors in tests involving the visual perception of space. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 20.
  • Marks, D. F. (1985). Imagery paradigms and methodology. Journal of Mental Imagery, 9, 93–106.
  • McFarlane, M. (1925). A study of practical ability. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 8 (1, Whole No. 8).
  • McGee, M. G. (1979, September). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 36(5).
  • McGuinness, D. (1985). When children don’t learn. New York: Basic Books.
  • McKim, R. H. (1978). The imaginarium: An environment and program for opening the mind’s eye. In B. S. Randhawa & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking and communication (pp. 61–75). New York: Academic Press.
  • McLaughlin, S. C. (1986). Dimensionality and states of consciousness. In B. B. Wolman & M. Ullman (Eds.), Handbook of states of consciousness (pp. 68–96). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Naruse, G. (1987). Imagery and altered states of consciousness. Journal of Mental Imagery, 11, 137–144.
  • Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Pylyshyn, A. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.
  • Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Richardson, A. (1969). Mental imagery. New York: Springer.
  • Richardson, A. (1983). Imagery: Definition and types. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 3–42). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Roe, A. (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists, and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 352(67, Serial No. 2).
  • Roth, S. K. (1993). Visualization in science and the arts. In Art, science & visual literacy. Selected reading from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Pittsburgh, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 363 289).
  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
  • Siler, C. R. (1998). Spatial dynamics, An alternative teaching tool in the social studies. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 415 179).
  • Smith, I. M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego, CA: Robert R. Knapp.
  • Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1985). Left brain, right brain (Rev. ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938) Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Yuille, J. C., & Catchpole, M. J. (1977). The role of imagery in models of cognition. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 171–180.
  • Weber, R. (1981). Reflections on David Bohm’s holomovement: A physicist’s model of cosmos and consciousness. In R. S. Valle & R. von Eckartsberg (Eds.), The metaphors of consciousness (pp. 121–140). New York: Plenum.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 24
  •  Issue 2
  • Publication Date: Winter 2000



Spatial–Temporal Intelligence: Original Thinking Processes of Gifted Inventors

Eileen E. Cooper

This psychological phenomenological research analyzed the cognition of gifted inventors and proposes a theory on original, creative thinking. Spatial intelligence is reviewed. Results provide 7 findings, including cognitive, motivational, affective, and psychokinesthetic factors. A key assumption that space–time cannot be separated supports a redefinition and renaming of spatial intelligence to spatial–temporal intelligence. Spatial–temporal intelligence is theorized as an abstract mode of cognition, combining intuitive and rational modes of logic. Cognitive imagery and dialog are described as reasoning tools in multidimensional and multidirectional space–time. Implications for educational practice suggest that spatial–temporal intelligence is complementary to linguistic-mathematical modes of thinking.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.