Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Brighton, C. M. (2002). Straddling the fence: Implementing best practices in an age of accountability. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 30–33.
  • Gould, H. C. (2000). Can we meet standards and encourage teachers to differentiate for the highly able? NASSP Bulletin, 84(615), 74–78.
  • Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
  • Pierce, R. L., & Adams, C. M. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 58–66.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2000a). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades (ERIC Digest). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDD00036).
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2000b). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6–11.
  • Winebrenner, S. (1999). Shortchanging the gifted. School Administrator, 56(9), 12–16.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 31
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Winter 2008



Science, Standards, and Differentiation: It Really Can Be Fun!

Toni A. Sondergeld and Robert A. Schultz

Teaching in a regular classroom has become more complicated than ever with increased student diversity and pressure to connect learning experiences to educational standards and test preparation (Brighton, 2002). Although teaching to the middle is often what occurs in traditional classrooms to meet required standards, it is neither an appropriate nor meaningful method of instruction with the inclusion of both students who are gifted and/or have learning disabilities or other disabling conditions. Differentiation of instruction, although challenging for the classroom teacher, is an effective approach that may resolve egalitarianism in education, where all students receive exactly the same educational experiences rather than “everyone having an equal opportunity to actualize their learning potential” (Winebrenner, 1999, p. 12). Our work in an inclusive third-grade classroom shows promise and a sense of hopefulness from both students and teacher alike with regard to meeting varied educational needs in science while still addressing mandated educational standards.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.