Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Asher, J. W. (2003). The rise to prominence: Educational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 189–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Berube, M. R. (1994). American school reform: Progressive, equity, and excellence movements, 1883–1993. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Chapman, P. D. (1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis M. Terman, applied psychology, and the intelligence testing movement, 1890–1930. New York: New York University Press.
  • Cremin, L. A. (1961). Transformation of the school. New York: Knopf.
  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Eds.).(2001). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Stedman, L. M. (1919). An experiment in educational democracy. Sierra Educational News, 15, 515–518.
  • Stedman, L. M. (1924). Education of gifted children. Yonkers-On-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
  • Terman, L. M. (1928). The influence of nature and nurture upon intelligence scores: An evaluation of the evidence in Part I of the 1928 Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 362–373.
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5–12.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 29
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Winter 2006



Historical Perspectives: Curriculum for the Gifted Student: Lulu Stedman’s Contributions

Jennifer L. Jolly

The field of gifted education emerged in the midst of the American progressive education movement. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, progressive education provided a pragmatic view of education that exemplified American societal values. “Progressive education was an attempt by educational reformers, psychologists, and philosophers to develop a school experience that would benefit the whole child’s intellectual, social, artistic, and moral development” (Berube, 1994, p. 14). The movement would be based on the scientific findings of evolution and the rising field of “new” psychology in conjunction with child-centered schools, which fostered creativity, self-expression, critical thinking, and individualism (Berube).



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.