User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Gifted Child Today > Volume 28 |  Issue 4 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Abilock, D. (2004). Alpine flowers. Knowledge Quest, 33(2), 8–9.
  • Arnosky, J. (1999). All about owls. Danbury, CT: Scholastic.
  • Austin, P. (2003 April/May). Challenging gifted readers. Book Links, 12, 32–37.
  • Berger, M., & Berger, G. (2002). Scholastic Q & A: Rain forests. Danbury, CT: Scholastic.
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
  • Bond, C. W., & Bond, L. T. (1983). Reading and the gifted student. Roeper Review, 5, 4–6.
  • Burnie, D. (2001). Earthwatch. New York: Dorling Kindersley Publishing.
  • Cassidy, J. (1981). Inquiry reading for the gifted. The Reading Teacher, 35, 17–21.
  • Cecil, N. (1999). Primary reading attitude survey. In N. Cecil (Ed.), Striking a balance—Positive balances for early literacy. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway Publishers.
  • Chall, J., & Conard, W. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder textbooks. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cherry, L. (2000). The great kapok tree: A tale of the Amazon Rain Forest. Stillwater, MN: Voyager Publishing.
  • Collins, N., & Aiex, N. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379637).
  • Como, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.
  • Deno, S., & Marston, D. (1987). Test of Oral Reading Fluency. Minneapolis, MN: Children’s Educational Services.
  • Dooley, C. (1993). The challenge: Meeting the needs of gifted readers. Reading Teacher, 46, 546–551.
  • Duke, N. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of international texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
  • Fox, M. (2004). When Little Bear bragged. In M. Fox (Ed.), Little Bear at work and play. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
  • Gentry, M. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Good, R. H. & Kaminski, R. A. (2001). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency. Retrieved June 3, 2005 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
  • Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., & Dill, S. (2002). DIBELS Retell Fluency. Retrieved June 3, 2005 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
  • Halsted, J. W. (1994). Some of my best friends are books: Guiding gifted readers from preschool to high school (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
  • Hansen, V. R., & Robenhagen, O. (1993). Abdullah’s Genuine Indonesian Curry Powder: About early readers and differentiated teaching. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
  • Hoover, H., Dunbar, S., & Frisbie, D. (2001). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Iran-Nejad, A. (1990). Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research, 60, 573–602.
  • Jackson, N. E. (1991). Are early readers gifted? Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Johansen, H. (2005). The duck and the owl. Boston: David R. Godine Publishing.
  • Johnston, T. (2000). The barn owls. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge Publishing.
  • Katz, L. (1997). A developmental approach to the assessment of young children. Retrieved January 12, 2005 from http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content4/assess.development.html.
  • Kingore, B. (2001). Gifted kids, gifted characters, and great books. Gifted Child Today, 24(1), 30–32.
  • Kulik, J. (1992). Analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1996). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo, & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2003). The response to challenge scale (RCS): Technical manual. (Available from Kimberley Lakes, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, 455 S. Main Street, Orange, CA 92868).
  • Lefevre, J., & Senechal, M. (1999, March 2). The relations among home-literacy factors, language and early-literacy skills, and reading acquisition. In M. A. Evans (Chair), Home literacy practices: Precursors, dimensions and outcomes in the early school years. Symposium presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
  • McIntosh, M. E. (1982). A historical look at gifted education as it relates to reading programs for the gifted. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED244472).
  • McKenna, M., & Kear, D. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 626–639.
  • McLeod, E. (2002). Lessons from Mother Earth. Vancouver, BC: Douglas & McIntyre.
  • Mills, J. R., & Jackson, N. E. (1990). Predictive significance of early giftedness: The case of young gifted reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 410–419.
  • Moore, M. (2005). Primary Reading Interest-A-Lyzer. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Reis, S., Burns, D., & Renzulli, J. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high-ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1988). A decade of dialogue on the three-ring conception of giftedness. Roeper Review, 11, 18–25.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In S. Baum, S. M. Reis, & L. R. Maxfield (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 1–25). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Renzulli, J.S. (n.d.). The total talent portfolio: A plan for identifying and developing gifts and talents. Retrieved January 12, 2005 from http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~nrcgt/sem/semart09.html.
  • Rhem, J. (1999). Pygmalion in the classroom. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 8(2), 1–4.
  • Richert, E. S. (1997). Excellence with equity in identification and programming. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 75–88). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Rogers, K. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 38–46.
  • Rohrkemper, M., & Como, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 297–326.
  • Schnur, J. O., & Lowrey, M. A. (1986). Some characteristics of young gifted readers. Early Child Development & Care, 26, 191–198.
  • Starko, A. J., & Schack, G. D. (1989). Perceived need, teacher efficacy, and teaching strategies for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 118–122.
  • Swanson, D. (1997). Welcome to the world of owls. New York: Walrus Books.
  • Tolan, S. S. (1985, November/December). Stuck in another dimension: The exceptionally gifted child in school. G/C/T 41(4), 22–26.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Tomlinson, C., Kaplan, S., Renzulli, J., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2001). An analysis of gifted education curriculum models. In F. A. Karnes, & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Vosslamber, A. (2002). Gifted readers: Who are they and how can they be served in the classroom? Gifted Child Today, 25(2), 14–21.
  • Wang, M. C., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989) Teaching students to assume an active role in their learning. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, (pp. 71–84). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Westberg Peters, L. (2003). Earthshake: Poems from the ground up. New York: Greenwillow.
  • Wildsmith, B. (2000). The owl and the woodpecker. England: Oxford University Press.
  • Winebrenner, S., & Devlin, B. (2001). Cluster grouping of gifted students: How to provide fulltime services on a part-time budget: Update 2001. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451663).
  • Yolen, J. (1987). Owl moon. New York: Philomel Books.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 28
  •  Issue 4
  • Publication Date: Fall 2005



Meeting the Educational Needs of Young Gifted Readers in the Regular Classroom

Michele Moore

Four-year-old Susie was sitting on the couch with her dad when a commercial for Kenmore washers and dryers was broadcast. “Kenmore colorfuls” flashed on the screen, and Susie read it aloud to her dad. “Kenmore colorfuls . . . look Daddy, you can get washing machines in different colors.” Her father looked at her with amazement; he didn’t know his daughter could read.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.