Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage.
  • Dettmer, P. (1998). Positive ripple effects of professional development for gifted programs. Tempo, 18(2), 1, 4–6, 23–24.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 547–552). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Glickman, E. (1996). Developing teacher thought. Journal of Staff Development, 7(1), 6–21.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
  • Schlichter, C. L. (1986). Talents unlimited: An inservice education model for teaching thinking skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 119–123.
  • Texas Education Agency (TEA). (1996). Texas state plan for the education of gifted/talented students. Austin: Author.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 26
  •  Issue 4
  • Publication Date: Fall 2003



Purposeful Professional Development: Planning Positive Experiences for Teachers of the Gifted and Talented

Melinda Wycoff, William R. Nash, Joyce E. Juntune, and Laura Mackay

Maximum academic achievement for gifted and talented students can only be accomplished when teachers are given the tools, support, and training needed to strengthen instructional skills and develop knowledge of the social and emotional needs of the students they serve (Feldhusen, 1997). Providing meaningful professional development to develop or enhance these skills is a challenge for administrators responsible for the planning and implementation of training experiences for teachers of gifted students.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.