User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Gifted Child Today > Volume 26 |  Issue 3 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995a). Appropriate differentiated services: Guides for best practices in the education of the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 18(5), 32–33.
  • Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995b). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268–275.
  • Dettmer, P. (1994). IEPs for gifted secondary students: Instruments for enhancing potential. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(4), 52–59.
  • Ford, D., Russo, C., & Harris, J. (1993). The quest for equity in gifted education: Seeking equal opportunities for gifted children leads to decisions on spending for all areas. Gifted Child Today, 16(6), 8–11.
  • Gifted education: Technical assistance and training resource document. (2000). Santa Fe: New Mexico State Department of Education, Special Education Office.
  • IDEA ’97 final regulations. (2002). Retrieved January 28, 2002, from http://www.ideapractices.org/idearegsmainTopicIndex.htm.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 300 et seq.
  • IDEAs That Work. (2001). IDEA ’97. Final regulations: Major issues. Retrieved December 30, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/Policy/IDEA/MAJOR.DOC.
  • Irvine, D. J. (1991). Gifted education without a state mandate. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 196–200.
  • Karnes, F. A., & Marquardt, R. G. (1991). Gifted children and the law: Mediation, due process, and court cases. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Karnes, F. A., Troxclair, D. A., & Marquardt, R. G. (1998). Due process in gifted education. Roeper Review, 20, 297–301.
  • Louisiana Department of Education. (2000). Regulations for implementation of the children with exceptionalities act. Bulletin 1706, Subpart B–Regulations for gifted/talented students.
  • Mitchell, P. B. (1994). State policy issues in the education of gifted and talented students. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED372583).
  • Passow, A. H., & Rudnitski, R. (1994). Transforming policy to enhance educational services for the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 271–275.
  • Purcell, J. (1992). Programs for the gifted in a state without a mandate: An “endangered species?” Roeper Review, 15, 93–95.
  • Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 261, 180–184, 261.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1988). A practical model for designing individual educational programs (IEPs) for gifted and talented students.Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 34–40.
  • Ross, P. O. (1997). Federal policy on gifted and talented education. In N.Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 553–559). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Russo, C. J., Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (1997). Giving the gifted their fair share. School Business Affairs, 63(5), 21–24.
  • Smith, S. (2000). Creating useful individualized education programs (IEPs). Arlington, VA: Eric Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED449636).
  • Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219–238.
  • Sytsma, R. (2000, Spring). Gifted and talented programs in America’s high schools: A preliminary survey report [Electronic version]. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
  • U.S. Congress, Public law 100-297, April, 1988.
  • U.S. Congress, Public law 105-117, June, 1997.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Whitmore, J. R. (1985). Developing individualized education programs for the gifted and talented. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED262509).
  • Willard-Holt, C. (1997). Gifted education and the law. Morristown, PA: Pennsylvania Association for Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425599).
  • Zeller, C. (1990). Evaluating gifted learners: Some new dimensions. Guidance and Counseling, 6(2), 26–32.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 26
  •  Issue 3
  • Publication Date: Summer 2003



State Policies Regarding Gifted Education

Elizabeth Shaunessy

Policies regarding the education of gifted students vary widely among the 50 states. Although the Jacob K. Javits Act (P.L. 100-297) is a small federal program that supports projects and research on issues pertaining to gifted children and talent development (Ross, 1997), no federal mandate requires specific services or protections for gifted students in public schools. While the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA; P.L. 105-117) has provided mandated education and procedural safeguards for students with disabilities, only a few of the 50 states offer similar provisions for gifted students.


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.