User Name:

Password:
Welcome Guest
Journals Home > Gifted Child Today > Volume 24 |  Issue 4 > Article Abstract
 

Abstract

Back to TOC
Reference
X

  • Ajzenberg-Selove, F. (1994). A matter of choices: Memoirs of a female physicist. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A call to action. Washington, DC: The American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
  • Arnold, K. (1995). Lives of Promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bateson, M. C. (1989). Composing a life. New York: Plume.
  • Beck, M., Kantrowski, B., & Beachy, L. (1990, July 16). Trading places. Newsweek, 48–54.
  • Blaubergs, M. S. (1980). Sex-role stereotyping and gifted girls’ experience and education. Roeper Review, 2, 13–15.
  • Block, J. H. (1982). Sex role identity and ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boorstin, D., & Kelley, B. M. (1992). A history of the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Callahan, C. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented (pp. 401–423). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
  • Casserly, P. L.(1975). An assessment of factors affecting female participation in advanced placement programs in mathematics, chemistry, and physics. Report of National Science Foundation (Grant GY–11325). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Catalyst Group. (1996). Women and corporate leadership. New York: Author.
  • Chamberlain, M. K. (Ed.). (1988). Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Sage.
  • Eccles, J. S. (1985). Why doesn’t Jane run? Sex differences in education and occupational patterns. In F. D. Horowitz, & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 251–295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Epstein, G. (1997, December). Low ceiling: How women are held back by sexism at work and child-rearing duties at home. Barron’s, 35–36.
  • Fennema, E., & Leder, G. (Eds.). (1990). Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Gavin, M. K. (1996). The development of math talent: Influences on students at a women’s college. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 476–485.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986, January). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 40, 43–51.
  • Grant, L. (1988, July/August). The gender climate of medical schools: Perspectives of women and men students. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 43, 109–110.
  • Grant, W. V., & Eiden, L. J. (1982). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1982). Classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
  • Handley, H. M., & Morse, L. W. (1984). Two-year study relating adolescents’ self-concept and gender role perceptions to achievement attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 599–607.
  • Hartmann, H. I. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 6, 366–394.
  • Hernández Garduño, E. L. (1997). Effects of teaching problem solving through cooperative learning methods on student mathematics achievement, attitudes toward mathematics, mathematics self-efficacy, and metacognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Hoffman, L. (1972). Early childhood experiences of women’s achievement motive. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 129–155.
  • Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 254–260.
  • Horner, M. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157–176.
  • Jones, M. G. (1989). Gender issues in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 33–38.
  • Jones, M. G., & Wheatley, J. (1990). Gender differences in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 861–874.
  • Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1980). Combating sexism in the preschool environment. Roeper Review, 2, 31–33.
  • Krupnick, C. G. (1984). Sex differences in college teachers’ classroom talk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  • Krupnick, C. G. (1992). Unlearning gender roles. In K. Winston, & M. J. Bane (Eds.), Gender and public policy: Cases and comment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Kuebli, J. & Fivush, R. (1992). Gender differences in parent-child conversations about past emotions. Sex Roles, 27, 683–98.
  • Lashaway-Bokina, N. (1996). Gifted, but gone: High ability, Mexican-American, female dropouts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Lee, V. E., & Marks, H. M. (1992). Who goes where? Choice of single-sex and coeducational independent secondary schools. Sociology of Education, 65, 226–253.
  • Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26, 254–263.
  • Noble, K. D. (1987). The dilemma of the gifted women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 367–378.
  • Noble, K. D. (1989). Counseling gifted women: Becoming the heroes of our own stories. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 131–141.
  • Office of Education.(1991, Fall). Women at thirtysomething. OERI Bulletin, p. 8.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., Shaw, S., Willis, G. B., & Krasney, N. (1990). Predictors of achievement in mathematics for gifted males and females. Gifted Child Quaterly, 34, 64–71.
  • O’Shea, M. M. (1998). Characteristics of high ability women who achieve in the 95th percentile on the quantitative section of the scholastic achievement test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Paley, A. M. (1984). Boys and girls. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Peterson, P. L., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 309–335.
  • Peterson, C. C., & Peterson, J. L. (1973). Preference for sex of offspring as a measure of change in sex attitudes. Psychology, 10(2), 3–5.
  • Pomerleau, A., Bolduc, D., & Malcuit, C. (1990). Pink or blue: Environmental gender stereotypes in the first two years of life. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 22, 359–367.
  • Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83–89.
  • Reis, S. M. (1995a). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 162–170.
  • Reis, S. M. (1995b). Older women’s reflections on eminence: Obstacles and opportunities. Roeper Review, 18, 66–72.
  • Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone: Compromises and challenges of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Reis, S. M., & Kettle, K. (1995). Storrs, CT: Neag Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development: Unpublished Evaluation Report.
  • Rheingold, H. L., & Cook, K. V. (1975). The content of boys’ and girls’ rooms as an index of parent behavior. Child Development, 46, 459–463.
  • Rizza, M. (1997). Exploring successful learning with talented female adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Rubin, L. J., & Borgers, S. B. (1990). Sexual harassment in universities in the 1980s. Sex Roles, 23, 397–411.
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1985). Sexism in the schoolroom of the ’80s. Psychology Today, 19, 54–57.
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: Macmillan.
  • Schrecker, E. W. (Ed.). (1998, March/April). Doing better: Annual report on the economic status of the profession, 1997–1998. Academe, 84(2), 14–103.
  • Schwartz, L. A., & Markham, W. T. (1985). Sex stereotyping in children’s achievements. Sex Roles, 12, 157–170.
  • Shepardson, D., & Pizzini, E. (1992). Gender bias in female elementary teachers’ perceptions of the scientific ability of students. Science Education, 76, 147–153.
  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Tobin, K. G., & Garnett, P. J. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71, 91–103.
  • Yee, D., & Eccles. J. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children’s math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317–334.
  • Zaldivar, R. A. (1997, November 30). In retirement, women face gender gap. Knight-Ridder Newspapers. The Hartford Courant, p. A1, A10.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
X
  • Volume 24
  •  Issue 4
  • Publication Date: Fall 2001



External Barriers Experienced by Gifted and Talented Girls and Women

Sally M. Reis

Gifted and talented females face conflicts between their own abilities and the social structure of their world. They confront both external barriers (i.e., lack of support from families, stereotyping, and acculturation in home, school, and the rest of society) and internal barriers (i.e., selfdoubt, self-criticism, lowered expectations, and the attribution of success to effort rather than ability).


ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.