Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Badolato, L. A. (1998). Recognizing and meeting the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Today, 21(6), 32–37.
  • Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted. New York: Merrill-Macmillan.
  • Cross, T. (1997). Guiding and supporting the development of gifted children, part one. Gifted Child Today, 21, 46–47, 49.
  • Diaz, E. I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 105–122.
  • Ford, D. Y., Alber, S. R., & Heward, W. L.(1998). Setting “motivation traps” for underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 21(5), 28–33.
  • Five teens charged with conspiracy. (1999, December 22). The Holdrege Citizen, p. A3.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Harris Education Research Council, (1991). Survey of American employers: An assessment of American education. New York:Author.
  • Hatch, T. (1990). Social intelligence in young children. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
  • Katz, E. (1994, 1995). Self-concept and the gifted student. Boulder, CO: Open Space Communications.
  • Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: McKay.
  • Olenchak, F. R. (1999). Affective development of gifted students with nontraditional talents. Roeper Review, 21, 293–297.
  • PA shooting suspect defended Asian girllawyer. (2001, March 8). Retrieved October 15, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/.
  • Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simons, S. B. (1978). Values and teaching: Working with values in the classroom (2nd Ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Shooting at California school leaves 2 dead and 13 hurt. (2001, March 6). The New York Times.
  • Sonnier, I. L. (Eds.). (1989). Affective education: Methods and techniques. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
  • Swiatek, M. A. (1998). Helping gifted adolescents cope with social stigma. Gifted Child Today, 21(1), 42–46.
  • Takanashi, R. (1993). The opportunities of adolescence—research, interventions, and policy: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 48, 85–87.
  • Wingert, P. (1999, March 22). Kids who don’t fit in. Newsweek, 133, 76–78.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 24
  •  Issue 4
  • Publication Date: Fall 2001
  • Page Number(s): 14-18
  • DOI: 10.4219/gct-2001-547



Integrating an Affective Component in the Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students

Karen Johnson

A third-grade student, Joe, is academically gifted, but he is a behavior problem. He was placed in a self-contained special education classroom where most of the students have special needs and have been identified as mentally retarded. How could something like this happen? Could it be because Joe never had support in developing social skills? Cases like Joe emphasize the need to integrate an affective component in the curriculum for gifted and talented students. Affective education is an important aspect in today’s schools, and it can be accomplished with little effort.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.