Welcome Guest
 

Abstract

Reference
X

  • Anderson, J. (1984). Time machines: The world of living history. Nashville, TN: American Association of State and Local History.
  • Anderson, J. (1985). The living history sourcebook. Nashville, TN: American Association of State and Local History.
  • Anderson, J. (1991). A living history reader. Nashville, TN: American Association of State and Local History.
  • Catton, B. (1951). The army of the Potomac: Mr. Lincoln’s army. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Catton, B. (1952). The army of the Potomac: Glory road. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Catton, B. (1953). The army of the Potomac: A S = stillness at Appomattox. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Catton, B. (1986). America goes to war: An introduction to the Civil War and its meaning to Americans today. New York: MJF Books.
  • Chilcoat, G. W. (1996). Drama in the social studies classroom: A review of the literature. Journal of Social Studies Research, 20(2), 3–17.
  • Colby, R. W. (1988). On the nature of dramatic intelligence: A study of developmental difference in the process of characterization by adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  • Corbin, D. (1988). Using drama in the classroom. The Councilor, 48, 43–48.
  • DeJonge, M. (1994). Staging battle: A performance analysis of military reenactment. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Drake, F., & Corbin, D. (1993). Making history come alive: Dramatization in the classroom. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods, 18(2), 59–67.
  • Fennessey, S. M. (2000). History in the spotlight: Creative drama and theatre practices for the social studies classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Fines, J., & Verrier, R. (1974). The drama of history: An experiment in cooperative teaching. London: New University Education.
  • Foote, S. (1986a). The Civil War a narrative: Fort Sumpter to Perryville. NY: Vintage Books.
  • Foote, S. (1986b). The Civil War a narrative: Fredericksburg to Meridian. NY: Vintage Books.
  • Foote, S. (1986c). The Civil War a narrative: Red River to Appomattox. NY: Vintage Books.
  • George, P. G., & Scheft, T. (1998). Children’s thoughts about the future: Comparing gifted and nongifted students after 20 years. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 224–239.
  • Johnson, C. (1995). Who was I?: Creating a living history persona. Excelsior Springs, MO: Fine Arts Press.
  • McPherson, J. M. (1988). The battle cry of freedom: The Civil War era. New York: Oxford University.
  • Morris, R. V., & Welch, M. (2000). How to perform acting out history in the classroom to enrich social studies education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Nolan, A. T. (1983). The Iron Brigade. Ann Arbor: Historical Society of Michigan.
  • Roth, S. F. (1998). Past into present: Effective techniques for first person historical interpretation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., & Yarbrough, D. W. (1992). Effects of the future problem-solving program on children’s concerns about the future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 190–194.
  • Taylor, P. M. (1998). Redcoats and Patriots: Reflective practice in drama and social studies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Wagner, B. J. (1976). Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
  • Wiley, B. I. (1943). The life of Johnny Reb. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
  • Wiley, B. I. (1952). The life of Billy Yank. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are mandatory.
 

Your Name:*
 

Your Email:*
 

Friend's Name:*
 

Friend's Email:*
 

Message:
 

 
Send CC to self
 

 
 

Bookmark
  • Volume 24
  •  Issue 1
  • Publication Date: Winter 2001



Using First-Person Presentation to Encourage Student Interest in Social History

Ronald V. Morris

The soldiers in the Civil War fought for the liberation of a group of people whom they did not know well—they fought a war for justice. After the Emancipation Proclamation the common people, these same soldiers who had fought in the Civil War, held uncommon ideals for the purpose of the war. The lives of most students are pretty common; they can connect, however, with a group of people, many of who were their age and held high ideals. Gifted students think about their future and the world where they live (Tallent-Runnels & Yarbrough, 1992). Unfortunately, George and Scheft (1998) found that gifted students were negative toward the future and their pessimism has increased over the past 20 years. At a time when gifted youth see their world through a pessimistic lens, it is important for them to realize that others who shared common lives or common situations have risen to do uncommon deeds and share uncommon ideals. The imperiled nation survived because of a commitment to great ideals such as democratic processes and the abilities of people to see self interest in community action as the common good. In this article, students examine a group of common people, a social history, to find what made them uncommon. Moreover, gifted and talented students realize that big ideas often intertwine with the thoughts and actions of a generation.



ShoppingCart Summary

Shopping
Your cart is empty.